Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e020980.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020980. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Time-Efficient Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Lowers Blood Pressure and Improves Endothelial Function, NO Bioavailability, and Oxidative Stress in Midlife/Older Adults With Above-Normal Blood Pressure

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Time-Efficient Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Lowers Blood Pressure and Improves Endothelial Function, NO Bioavailability, and Oxidative Stress in Midlife/Older Adults With Above-Normal Blood Pressure

Daniel H Craighead et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background High-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) is a novel, time-efficient physical training modality. Methods and Results We performed a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial to investigate whether 6 weeks of IMST (30 breaths/day, 6 days/week) improves blood pressure, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in midlife/older adults (aged 50-79 years) with systolic blood pressure ≥120 mm Hg, while also investigating potential mechanisms and long-lasting effects. Thirty-six participants completed high-resistance IMST (75% maximal inspiratory pressure, n=18) or low-resistance sham training (15% maximal inspiratory pressure, n=18). IMST was safe, well tolerated, and had excellent adherence (≈95% of training sessions completed). Casual systolic blood pressure decreased from 135±2 mm Hg to 126±3 mm Hg (P<0.01) with IMST, which was ≈75% sustained 6 weeks after IMST (P<0.01), whereas IMST modestly decreased casual diastolic blood pressure (79±2 mm Hg to 77±2 mm Hg, P=0.03); blood pressure was unaffected by sham training (all P>0.05). Twenty-four hour systolic blood pressure was lower after IMST versus sham training (P=0.01). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation improved ≈45% with IMST (P<0.01) but was unchanged with sham training (P=0.73). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells cultured with subject serum sampled after versus before IMST exhibited increased NO bioavailability, greater endothelial NO synthase activation, and lower reactive oxygen species bioactivity (P<0.05). IMST decreased C-reactive protein (P=0.05) and altered select circulating metabolites (targeted plasma metabolomics) associated with cardiovascular function. Neither IMST nor sham training influenced arterial stiffness (P>0.05). Conclusions High-resistance IMST is a safe, highly adherable lifestyle intervention for improving blood pressure and endothelial function in midlife/older adults with above-normal initial systolic blood pressure. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03266510.

Keywords: NO; exercise training; flow‐mediated dilation; hypertension; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Participant progress through the study.
IMST indicates inspiratory muscle strength training.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Casual systolic blood pressure (SBP) (A) and diastolic BP (DBP) (B) at baseline and after 6 weeks of inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) or sham training.
Data are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs baseline.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Casual systolic blood pressure (SBP) (A) and diastolic BP (DBP) (B) at baseline, after 6 weeks of inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) or sham training and after 6 weeks of abstaining from training (follow‐up).
n=15 IMST, n=14 sham. Data are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs baseline.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Brachial artery flow‐mediated dilation (FMDBA) expressed as percent dilation in all subjects as average (A) and individual data (B), midlife/older men (n=9 inspiratory muscle strength training [IMST], n=10 sham) (C), and estrogen‐deficient postmenopausal (PME‐) women (n=7 IMST, n=8 sham) (D) at baseline and after 6 weeks of IMST or sham training.
Data are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs baseline. P<0.05 vs sham.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Human umbilical vein endothelial cell NO production (A), phosphorylated endothelial NO synthase (p‐eNOSser1177) abundance (B), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity (C), following a 24‐hour incubation with serum from subjects, with example fluorescent images below ROS activity and NO production.
Data are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs baseline. P<0.05 vs sham. IMST indicates inspiratory muscle strength training.

Comment in

  • Take a Deep, Resisted, Breath.
    Joyner MJ, Baker SE. Joyner MJ, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e022203. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022203. Epub 2021 Jun 29. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34184555 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Sistino JJ, Fitzgerald DC. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the United States: implications for the perfusion profession. A 2017 update. Perfusion. 2017;32:501–506. DOI: 10.1177/0267659117696140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joseph P, Leong D, McKee M, Anand SS, Schwalm J‐D, Teo K, Mente A, Yusuf S. Reducing the global burden of cardiovascular disease, part 1: the epidemiology and risk factors. Circ Res. 2017;121:677–694. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.308903. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Delling FN, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics‐2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141:e139–e596. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang Y, Wang S, Cai X, Mai W, Hu Y, Tang H, Xu D. Prehypertension and incidence of cardiovascular disease: a meta‐analysis. BMC Med. 2013;11:177. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-177. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J, Murray CJL, Ezzati M. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000058. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data