Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 29;13(12):16773-16785.
doi: 10.18632/aging.203198. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Prognostic comparison between radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients at different stages and ages

Affiliations

Prognostic comparison between radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients at different stages and ages

Fei Wang et al. Aging (Albany NY). .

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) are both evidence-based nonconservative treatments for prostate cancer (PCa). However, which treatment is better remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the prognostic difference between radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in PCa patients at different stages and ages. Two independent PCa cohorts (the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, SEER; and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian, PLCO) were employed. Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In both cohorts, patients who received RT exhibited a worse prognostic outcome than those who underwent RP. When stratified analysis was performed by tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and age at diagnosis in the SEER cohort, the HR of RT versus RP for overall survival increased with TNM stage but decreased with age. Specifically, PCa patients in stage I in the age range of 55-84 years, stage IIA at 70-85+ years, and stage IIB at 75-85+ years had better survival with RT than RP patients (p < 0.05). In contrast, patients in stages IIA, IIB, III and IV with respective age ranges of 55-64 years; 50-74 years; 55-59, 65-74 years; and 45-74 years showed worse survival with RT compared with RP (p < 0.05). These findings were partially validated in the PLCO dataset. Our results indicated that the choice between RT and RP should be guided by TNM stage and age. These findings may facilitate counseling regarding the prognostic effect of RT and RP for PCa patients.

Keywords: ages of onset; prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flowchart of screening participants using the SEER and PLCO cohort. (A) for SEER screening, (B) for PLCO screening. TNM stage: tumor node metastasis stage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between age and hazard ratio of RT versus RP for patients with prostate cancer. (A) All groups in SEER. (B) All groups in PLCO. (C) Stage I group in SEER. (D) Stage II group in SEER. (E) Stage III group in SEER. (F) Stage IV group in SEER. SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; PLCO, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian. The solid lines are multivariable adjusted hazard ratios. The shaded areas are the 95% confidence intervals. The dotted lines are coordinate 1 on the vertical axis.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68:7–30. 10.3322/caac.21442 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu S, Yang L, Yuan Y, Li H, Tian J, Lu S, Wang N, Ji J. Cancer incidence in Beijing, 2014. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018; 30:13–20. 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.02 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A, Damber JE, Angelsen A, Fransson P, Lund JA, Tasdemir I, Hoyer M, Wiklund F, Fosså SD, and Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study 7, and Swedish Association for Urological Oncology 3. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009; 373:301–08. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61815-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, Salo JO, Folmerz P, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Spångberg A, Busch C, Nordling S, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Johansson JE, Norlén BJ, and Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:781–89. 10.1056/NEJMoa012794 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wallis CJD, Saskin R, Choo R, Herschorn S, Kodama RT, Satkunasivam R, Shah PS, Danjoux C, Nam RK. Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Clinically-localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016; 70:21–30. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.010 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types