Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 29;16(6):e0253509.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253509. eCollection 2021.

Emotion regulation and peripheral psychophysiological correlates in the management of induced pain: A systematic review

Irene Jaén  1 , Amanda Díaz-García  2 , M Carmen Pastor  1 , Azucena García-Palacios  1
Affiliations

Emotion regulation and peripheral psychophysiological correlates in the management of induced pain: A systematic review

Irene Jaén et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance strategies have been shown to be effective in reducing pain experience and increasing pain tolerance. However, no systematic reviews have focused on the relationship between the use of these two strategies and peripheral physiological correlates when pain is experimentally induced. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing literature that explores the relationship between emotion regulation strategies (i.e., cognitive reappraisal and acceptance) and peripheral correlates of the autonomic nervous system and facial electromyography, such as affect-modulated responses and corrugator activity, on laboratory tasks where pain is induced. The systematic review identifies nine experimental studies that meet our inclusion criteria, none of which compare these strategies. Although cognitive reappraisal and acceptance strategies appear to be associated with decreased psychological responses, mixed results were found for the effects of the use of both strategies on all the physiological correlates. These inconsistencies between the studies might be explained by the high methodological heterogeneity in the task designs, as well as a lack of consistency between the instructions used in the different studies for cognitive reappraisal, acceptance, and the control conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have conflicts of interest to declare related to the article.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain Mechanisms: A new theory. Science. 1965;150: 971–9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melzack R. Gate control theory: On the evolution of pain concepts. Pain Forum. 1996;5(2):128–38.
    1. Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020. Sep;161(9):1976–82. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Treede R-D. Reconsidering the International Association for the study of pain definition of pain. Pain Reports. 2018;3(2):3–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keefe FJ, Lumley M, Anderson T, Lynch T, Carson KL. Pain and emotion: New research directions. J Clin Psychol. 2001. Apr 1;57(4):587–607. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1030 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types