Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Aug;10(8):928-940.
doi: 10.1002/psp4.12666. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

PK/PD modeling analysis for dosing regimen selection of isatuximab as single agent and in combination therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

PK/PD modeling analysis for dosing regimen selection of isatuximab as single agent and in combination therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

Kimiko Koiwai et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

This analysis describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling framework that supported selection of the isatuximab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) dosing regimen alongside its early clinical development in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The PK/PD mathematical model characterized the variations of patient serum M-protein concentrations, the primary marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Three separate PK/PD models were built sequentially as data became available from phase I clinical trials. The primary PK/PD analysis was initiated using monotherapy phase I study data (n = 122), followed by analysis of data collected from phase Ib combination studies with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd, n = 40) and then with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd, n = 31). Using the PK/PD model, abnormal "myeloma" protein (M-protein) profiles under different isatuximab dosing regimens were simulated. Overall, simulations revealed that regimens which included a loading period of four weekly administrations followed by administration every 2 weeks thereafter (QW4-Q2W), reduced M-protein levels more than a Q2W regimen without a loading period. For isatuximab monotherapy, a 20 mg/kg dose induced greater reduction in serum M-protein levels compared with doses equal or lower than 10 mg/kg. For isatuximab in combination with either Rd or Pd, simulations yielded no substantial benefit in terms of M-protein reduction between isatuximab 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg. These PK/PD analyses supported the use of isatuximab 10 mg/kg QW4-Q2W in combination with Pd in the phase III trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.K., R.E.‐C., H.‐T.T., C.B., J.B.F., C.V.‐F., M.‐L.R., H.v.d.V., D.S., and L.N. are employees of Sanofi and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Model predictions of M‐protein profiles under different isatuximab dose regimens. Q2W, administration every 2 weeks; QW4‐Q2W, weekly administration for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks thereafter
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Model predictions of M‐protein profiles under different isatuximab dose regimens in mono‐ and combination therapy. (a) Comparison of median predicted serum‐M protein concentrations between isatuximab monotherapy (10 and 20 mg/kg QW4–Q2W) and each combination therapy isatuximab 10 mg/kg QW4–Q2W with lenalidomide or pomalidomide. (b) Comparison of median predicted serum M‐protein concentrations between isatuximab 10 mg/kg QW4–Q2W and 20 mg/kg QW4–Q2W on each combination with lenalidomide or pomalidomide. d, dexamethasone; P, pomalidomide; Q2W, administration every 2 weeks; QW4‐Q2W, weekly administration for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks thereafter; R, lenalidomide

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1860‐1873. - PubMed
    1. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23:3‐9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durie BGM, Kyle RA, Belch A, et al. Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. Hematol J. 2003;4:379‐398. - PubMed
    1. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1046‐1060. - PubMed
    1. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328‐e346. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms