PK/PD modeling analysis for dosing regimen selection of isatuximab as single agent and in combination therapy in patients with multiple myeloma
- PMID: 34185964
- PMCID: PMC8376141
- DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12666
PK/PD modeling analysis for dosing regimen selection of isatuximab as single agent and in combination therapy in patients with multiple myeloma
Abstract
This analysis describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling framework that supported selection of the isatuximab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) dosing regimen alongside its early clinical development in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The PK/PD mathematical model characterized the variations of patient serum M-protein concentrations, the primary marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Three separate PK/PD models were built sequentially as data became available from phase I clinical trials. The primary PK/PD analysis was initiated using monotherapy phase I study data (n = 122), followed by analysis of data collected from phase Ib combination studies with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd, n = 40) and then with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd, n = 31). Using the PK/PD model, abnormal "myeloma" protein (M-protein) profiles under different isatuximab dosing regimens were simulated. Overall, simulations revealed that regimens which included a loading period of four weekly administrations followed by administration every 2 weeks thereafter (QW4-Q2W), reduced M-protein levels more than a Q2W regimen without a loading period. For isatuximab monotherapy, a 20 mg/kg dose induced greater reduction in serum M-protein levels compared with doses equal or lower than 10 mg/kg. For isatuximab in combination with either Rd or Pd, simulations yielded no substantial benefit in terms of M-protein reduction between isatuximab 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg. These PK/PD analyses supported the use of isatuximab 10 mg/kg QW4-Q2W in combination with Pd in the phase III trial.
© 2021 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Conflict of interest statement
K.K., R.E.‐C., H.‐T.T., C.B., J.B.F., C.V.‐F., M.‐L.R., H.v.d.V., D.S., and L.N. are employees of Sanofi and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company.
Figures
References
-
- Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1860‐1873. - PubMed
-
- Durie BGM, Kyle RA, Belch A, et al. Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. Hematol J. 2003;4:379‐398. - PubMed
-
- Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1046‐1060. - PubMed
-
- Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328‐e346. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
