Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jul 10;398(10295):143-155.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01324-6. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

Julio Rosenstock et al. Lancet. .

Erratum in

  • Department of Error.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01556-7. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34274062 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Despite advancements in care, many people with type 2 diabetes do not meet treatment goals; thus, development of new therapies is needed. We aimed to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide monotherapy versus placebo in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise alone.

Methods: We did a 40-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (SURPASS-1), at 52 medical research centres and hospitals in India, Japan, Mexico, and the USA. Adult participants (≥18 years) were included if they had type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise alone and if they were naive to injectable diabetes therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) via computer-generated random sequence to once a week tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg), or placebo. All participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the mean change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline at 40 weeks. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03954834.

Findings: From June 3, 2019, to Oct 28, 2020, of 705 individuals assessed for eligibility, 478 (mean baseline HbA1c 7·9% [63 mmol/mol], age 54·1 years [SD 11·9], 231 [48%] women, diabetes duration 4·7 years, and body-mass index 31·9 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to tirzepatide 5 mg (n=121 [25%]), tirzepatide 10 mg (n=121 [25%]), tirzepatide 15 mg (n=121 [25%]), or placebo (n=115 [24%]). 66 (14%) participants discontinued the study drug and 50 (10%) discontinued the study prematurely. At 40 weeks, all tirzepatide doses were superior to placebo for changes from baseline in HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, bodyweight, and HbA1c targets of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol) and less than 5·7% (<39 mmol/mol). Mean HbA1c decreased from baseline by 1·87% (20 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 5 mg, 1·89% (21 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 10 mg, and 2·07% (23 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 15 mg versus +0·04% with placebo (+0·4 mmol/mol), resulting in estimated treatment differences versus placebo of -1·91% (-21 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 5 mg, -1·93% (-21 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 10 mg, and -2·11% (-23 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 15 mg (all p<0·0001). More participants on tirzepatide than on placebo met HbA1c targets of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol; 87-92% vs 20%) and 6·5% or less (≤48 mmol/mol; 81-86% vs 10%) and 31-52% of patients on tirzepatide versus 1% on placebo reached an HbA1c of less than 5·7% (<39 mmol/mol). Tirzepatide induced a dose-dependent bodyweight loss ranging from 7·0 to 9·5 kg. The most frequent adverse events with tirzepatide were mild to moderate and transient gastrointestinal events, including nausea (12-18% vs 6%), diarrhoea (12-14% vs 8%), and vomiting (2-6% vs 2%). No clinically significant (<54 mg/dL [<3 mmol/L]) or severe hypoglycaemia were reported with tirzepatide. One death occurred in the placebo group.

Interpretation: Tirzepatide showed robust improvements in glycaemic control and bodyweight, without increased risk of hypoglycaemia. The safety profile was consistent with GLP-1 receptor agonists, indicating a potential monotherapy use of tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes treatment.

Funding: Eli Lilly and Company.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest CJL, LFL, HM, XC, CAK, and VTT are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. JR serves on scientific advisory boards and received honoraria or consulting fees from Applied Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Hanmi, Oramed, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intarcia; and also received grants and research support from Applied Therapeutics, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Hanmi, Oramed, Janssen, Lexicon, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intarcia. CW has received consulting and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Sanofi; research support from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk; and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. JPF declares grants from Eli Lilly and Company, AbbVie, Akcea, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cirius, CymaBay, Enanta, Genentech, Intercept, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Lexicon, Ligand, Madrigal, Merck, Mylan, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Theracos; has served on advisory boards and received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Johnson and Johnson, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and served on a speaker bureau for Merck and Sanofi. SK received research support from Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA, and Eli Lilly Japan; received honoraria for lectures from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly Japan, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; and received consulting and advisory board fees from Novo Nordisk.

Comment in

Publication types

Associated data