Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 29;22(1):81.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00647-x.

Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public's perspective

Annabelle Cumyn  1 , Adrien Barton  1   2 , Roxanne Dault  1 , Nissrine Safa  1 , Anne-Marie Cloutier  1 , Jean-François Ethier  3
Affiliations

Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public's perspective

Annabelle Cumyn et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: The advent of learning healthcare systems (LHSs) raises an important implementation challenge concerning how to request and manage consent to support secondary use of data in learning cycles, particularly research activities. Current consent models in Quebec were not established with the context of LHSs in mind and do not support the agility and transparency required to obtain consent from all involved, especially the citizens. Therefore, a new approach to consent is needed. Previous work identified the meta-consent model as a promising alternative to fulfill the requirements of LHSs, particularly large-scale deployments. We elicited the public's attitude toward the meta-consent model to evaluate if the model could be understood by the citizens and would be deemed acceptable to prepare for its possible implementation in Quebec.

Methods: Eight focus groups, with a total of 63 members of the general public from various backgrounds were conducted in Quebec, Canada, in 2019. Explicit attention was given to literacy levels, language spoken at home and rural vs urban settings. We assessed attitudes, concerns and facilitators regarding key components of the meta-consent model: predefined categories to personalized consent requests, a dynamic web-based infrastructure to record meta-consent, and default settings. To analyse the discussions, a thematic content analysis was performed using a qualitative software.

Results: Our findings showed that participants were supportive of this new approach of consent as it promotes transparency and offers autonomy for the management of their health data. Key facilitators were identified to be considered in the implementation of a meta-consent model in the Quebec LHSs: information and transparency, awareness campaigns, development of educational tools, collaboration of front-line healthcare professionals, default settings deemed acceptable by the society as well as close partnerships with recognized and trusted institutions.

Conclusions: This qualitative study reveals the openness of a sample of the Quebec population regarding the meta-consent model for secondary use of health data for research. This first exploratory study conducted with the public is an important step in guiding decision-makers in the next phases of implementing the various strategies to support access and use of health data in Quebec.

Keywords: Focus groups; Health data; Learning healthcare system; Meta-consent; Public opinion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, regarding the conduct of this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participants’ meta-consent preferences for the 16 predefined categories of research projects. Note: This figure was made by author Roxanne Dault
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary [Internet]. In Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007 [cited 2020 AprIL 23]. (The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53494/. - PubMed
    1. Ethier J-F, McGilchrist M, Barton A, Cloutier A-M, Curcin V, Delaney BC, et al. The TRANSFoRm project: experience and lessons learned regarding functional and interoperability requirements to support primary care. Learn Health Syst. 2018;2(2):e10037. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedman CP, Rubin JC, Sullivan KJ. Toward an information infrastructure for global health improvement. Yearb Med Inform. 2017;26(1):16–23. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GRIIS. PARS3 [Internet]. GRIIS. 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. https://griis.ca/en/solutions/pars3/.
    1. Cumyn A, Dault R, Barton A, Cloutier AM, Ethier JF. Citizens, research ethics committee members and researchers' attitude toward information and consent for the secondary use of health data: implications for research within learning health systems. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021. 10.1177/1556264621992214. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources