Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials
- PMID: 34187845
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324471
Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials
Abstract
Background and aims: Artificial intelligence has been shown to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR) as the main surrogate outcome parameter of colonoscopy quality. To which extent this effect may be related to physician experience is not known. We performed a randomised trial with colonoscopists in their qualification period (AID-2) and compared these data with a previously published randomised trial in expert endoscopists (AID-1).
Methods: In this prospective, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (AID-2), 10 non-expert endoscopists (<2000 colonoscopies) performed screening/surveillance/diagnostic colonoscopies in consecutive 40-80 year-old subjects using high-definition colonoscopy with or without a real-time deep-learning computer-aided detection (CADe) (GI Genius, Medtronic). The primary outcome was ADR in both groups with histology of resected lesions as reference. In a post-hoc analysis, data from this randomised controlled trial (RCT) were compared with data from the previous AID-1 RCT involving six experienced endoscopists in an otherwise similar setting.
Results: In 660 patients (62.3±10 years; men/women: 330/330) with equal distribution of study parameters, overall ADR was higher in the CADe than in the control group (53.3% vs 44.5%; relative risk (RR): 1.22; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.40; p<0.01 for non-inferiority and p=0.02 for superiority). Similar increases were seen in adenoma numbers per colonoscopy and in small and distal lesions. No differences were observed with regards to detection of non-neoplastic lesions. When pooling these data with those from the AID-1 study, use of CADe (RR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.42) and colonoscopy indication, but not the level of examiner experience (RR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.16) were associated with ADR differences in a multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: In less experienced examiners, CADe assistance during colonoscopy increased ADR and a number of related polyp parameters as compared with the control group. Experience appears to play a minor role as determining factor for ADR.
Trial registration number: NCT:04260321.
Keywords: adenoma; artificial Intelligence; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; screening.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Conflict of interest statement/disclosure(s): All authors for equipment loan by Medtronic. AR and CH received consultancy fee from Medtronic. MBW provides consulting activity to Medtronic and Cosmo on behalf of Mayo Clinic and has equity interest in Virgo.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial.Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):512-520.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062. Epub 2020 May 1. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 32371116 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Real-Time Computer-Aided Polyp Detection System (ENDO-AID) on Adenoma Detection in Endoscopists-in-Training: A Randomized Trial.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;22(3):630-641.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.019. Epub 2023 Nov 2. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 37918685 Clinical Trial.
-
Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32598963
-
Effect of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal adenoma in routine colonoscopy (COLO-GENIUS): a single-centre randomised controlled trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;8(8):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00104-8. Epub 2023 Jun 1. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37269872 Clinical Trial.
-
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;15(3):e00671. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000671. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38146871 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Single Versus Second Observer vs Artificial Intelligence to Increase the ADENOMA Detection Rate of Colonoscopy-A Network Analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Apr;69(4):1380-1388. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08341-9. Epub 2024 Mar 4. Dig Dis Sci. 2024. PMID: 38436866 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in endoscopic diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):4045-4051. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i10.4045. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39473956 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233946. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33946. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36173632 Free PMC article.
-
Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems.Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):63-69. doi: 10.1055/a-2147-0571. Epub 2023 Aug 2. Endoscopy. 2024. PMID: 37532115 Free PMC article.
-
[Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Precancerous and Early Cancerous Lesions in the Rectum].Zentralbl Chir. 2024 Feb;149(1):46-55. doi: 10.1055/a-2256-6724. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Zentralbl Chir. 2024. PMID: 38442883 Free PMC article. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials