Mifepristone in Fibroids: Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Biweekly Dosage Vs Daily Dosage Schedule
- PMID: 34188425
- PMCID: PMC8189336
- DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_90_20
Mifepristone in Fibroids: Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Biweekly Dosage Vs Daily Dosage Schedule
Abstract
Background: Leiomyomas are the most prevalent benign tumors of the uterus and are seen more with increasing age. 50 mg biweekly dose was compared with 25 mg daily dose in terms of efficacy and safety in symptomatic women as the biweekly dose maybe an economically better alternative. Two different dosages of mifepristone for medical management of fibroids were compared in terms of efficacy and safety in symptomatic women.
Materials and methods: Ninety-two women were recruited who fulfilled the criteria after informed consent and were randomized in two groups. Sample size was calculated on the basis of earlier literature, for response in terms of reduction in fibroid volume, assuming 1% level of significance and 95 % power of study, the optimum sample size came out to be minimum 27 in each group. Assuming loss to follow up of few patients, we took 45 patients in group 1 and 47 patients in group 2. Group 1 was given mifepristone in a dose of 25 mg once a day and Group 2 was given mifepristone 50 mg biweekly for 3 months. Fibroid volume, uterine volume, endometrial thickness, pictorial blood loss assessment chart score, hemoglobin levels, and liver transaminases were recorded at the beginning and at the end of treatment. Side effects were noted at the end of the treatment.
Results: Both the dosages lead to improvement in symptoms of the patients. Mifepristone significantly reduced fibroid volume in both the groups, but the difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.99). Mifepristone treatment significantly reduced bleeding and increased hemoglobin levels in both the groups. The side effects were mild and tolerable.
Conclusion: Mifepristone in both dosages is highly efficacious in causing amenorrhea, improving anemia, and enhancing the quality of life, and hence 50 mg biweekly dosage shows potential for being cost efficient.
Keywords: Biweekly; comparison; fibroids; mifepristone.
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Mid-life Health.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of Use of Long-Term, Low-Dose Mifepristone for the Treatment of Fibroids.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):494-8. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0861-7. Epub 2016 Mar 18. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016. PMID: 27651652 Free PMC article.
-
Mifepristone's Efficacy for Symptomatic Relief and Size Reduction in Uterine Fibroids: A 2023 Prospective Observational Study at Rabia Balkhi Hospital, Afghanistan.Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73432. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39664156 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized double-blind trial comparing low dose and conventional dose of a modified traditional herbal formula Guizhi Fuling Wan in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.J Ethnopharmacol. 2022 Jan 30;283:114676. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114676. Epub 2021 Sep 22. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022. PMID: 34562564 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of Chinese herbal prescriptions containing Ejiao or Velvet antler for management of uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):8772-8786. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1755. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 34488366
-
Anti-progesterones for the interruption of pregnancy.Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Sep;2(3):617-29. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(88)80048-8. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988. PMID: 3069265 Review.
Cited by
-
Progesterone signaling in uterine fibroids: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Life Sci. 2025 Feb 1;362:123345. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123345. Epub 2024 Dec 29. Life Sci. 2025. PMID: 39740758 Review.
References
-
- Tropeano G, Amoroso S, Scambia G. Non-surgical management of uterine fibroids. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:259–74. - PubMed
-
- Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M. Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: How to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:136–52. - PubMed
-
- Higham JM, O’Brien PM, Shaw RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:734–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources