Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 15:14:11786329211024788.
doi: 10.1177/11786329211024788. eCollection 2021.

Factors that Determine Comprehensive Categorical Classification of EHR Implementation Levels

Soumya Upadhyay  1 , William Opoku-Agyeman  2
Affiliations

Factors that Determine Comprehensive Categorical Classification of EHR Implementation Levels

Soumya Upadhyay et al. Health Serv Insights. .

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have the potential to alleviate patient safety mistakes. Of the various levels of EHR, advanced or higher-level functionalities of EHR are designed to improve patient safety. Certain organizational and environmental factors may pose as barriers toward implementing all of the functionalities, leaving certain hospitals intermediate between basic and comprehensive levels of implementation. This study identifies a comprehensive categorical classification that includes hospitals that have functionalities between basic and comprehensive levels of EHR and determines the organizational and environmental factors that may influence hospitals to implement one or more combinations of these categories. A longitudinal panel design was used. Ordinal logistic regression with random effects model was fitted with robust cluster standard errors. Our sample consisted of non-federal general acute care hospitals utilizing a panel design from 2010 to 2016 with 17 586 hospital-year observations (or an average of 2600 hospitals per year). Larger size hospitals, ones with higher total margin, metropolitan and urban hospitals, system affiliated hospitals, and those in higher managed care penetration areas have higher odds of belonging in one of the higher categories of EHR implementation. Hospitals that can access a greater amount of human resources and financial assets from their environments, may implement higher levels of EHR. Initial and maintenance costs of EHR, interoperability issues, and inability to distribute high costs of training across facilities may stymie implementation of higher EHR functionalities. Policymaking to encourage competition among vendors may possibly lower the implementation price for hospitals with limited resources.

Keywords: EHR implementation; RDT; comprehensive EHR; hospitals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percent EHR implementation level 2010 to 2016.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Vol. 6. National Academies Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9:122-128. - PubMed
    1. Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical decision-support systems. In: Shortliffe E, Cimino J, eds. Biomedical Informatics. Springer; 2014:643-674.
    1. Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, et al.. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e2-e8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henry J, Pylypchuk Y, Searcy T, Patel V. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008–2015. ONC Data Brief. 2016;35:1-9.