Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;10(5):1486-1496.
doi: 10.21037/tp-20-89.

A narrative review of in utero gene therapy: advances, challenges, and future considerations

Affiliations
Review

A narrative review of in utero gene therapy: advances, challenges, and future considerations

Nicholas K Yung et al. Transl Pediatr. 2021 May.

Abstract

The field of in utero gene therapy (IUGT) represents a crossroad of technologic advancements and medical ethical boundaries. Several strategies have been developed for IUGT focusing on either modifying endogenous genes, replacing missing genes, or modifying gene transcription products. The list of candidate diseases such as hemoglobinopathies, cystic fibrosis, lysosomal storage disorders continues to grow with new strategies being developed as our understanding of their respective underlying molecular pathogenesis increases. Treatment in utero has several distinct advantages to postnatal treatment. Biologic and physiologic phenomena enable the delivery of a higher effective dose, generation of immune tolerance, and the prevention of phenotypic onset for genetic diseases. Therapeutic technology for IUGT including CRISPR-Cas9 systems, zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), and peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) has already shown promise in animal models and early postnatal clinical trials. While the ability to detect fetal diagnoses has dramatically improved with developments in ultrasound and next-generation sequencing, treatment options remain experimental, with several translational gaps remaining prior to implementation in the clinical realm. Complicating this issue, the potential diseases targeted by this approach are often debilitating and would otherwise prove fatal if not treated in some manner. The leap from small animals to large animals, and subsequently, to humans will require further vigorous testing of safety and efficacy.

Keywords: Fetal therapies; gene editing; genetic therapy; prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-89). The series “Fetal Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Dr. ASR has a patent Compositions and Methods for In Utero Delivery pending, a patent Compositions and Methods for Embryonic Gene Editing In Vitro pending, and a patent Compositions and Methods for Enhancing Triplex and Nuclease-Based Gene Editing pending. Dr. DHS has a patent 20200113821 issued. The other authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lentiviral transduction of cells resulting in either episomal expression or integration into the host genome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CRISPR-Cas9 system demonstrating the creation of double-stranded break in DNA followed by either NHEJ generating Indels or HDR with insertion of donor DNA. Cas9, CRISPR associated protein 9; sgRNA, single guide RNA; Indel, insertion/deletion; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; HDR, homology directed repair.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structure and mechanism of gene therapy using PNA to promote homology directed repair. (A) Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) backbone demonstrating electrical neutrality; (B) PNA forming triple helical structure triggering homology directed repair with donor DNA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlson LM, Vora NL. Prenatal Diagnosis: Screening and Diagnostic Tools. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2017;44:245-56. 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.02.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van den Veyver IB. Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing. F1000Res 2016;5:2591. 10.12688/f1000research.9215.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2175-84. 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liao GJ, Lun FM, Zheng YW, et al. Targeted massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA permits efficient and unbiased detection of fetal alleles. Clin Chem 2011;57:92-101. 10.1373/clinchem.2010.154336 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benn P, Borrell A, Chiu RW, et al. Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:725-34. 10.1002/pd.4608 - DOI - PubMed