Factors associated with a high-risk return visit to the emergency department: a case-crossover study
- PMID: 34191766
- DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000851
Factors associated with a high-risk return visit to the emergency department: a case-crossover study
Abstract
Background and importance: Although factors related to a return emergency department (ED) visit have been reported, few studies have examined 'high-risk' return ED visits with serious adverse outcomes. Understanding factors associated with high-risk return ED visits may help with early recognition and prevention of these catastrophic events.
Objectives: We aimed to (1) estimate the incidence of high-risk return ED visits, and (2) to investigate time-varying factors associated with these revisits.
Design: Case-crossover study.
Settings and participants: We used electronic clinical warehouse data from a tertiary medical center. We retrieved data from 651 815 ED visits over a 6-year period. Patient demographics and computerized triage information were extracted.
Outcome measure and analysis: A high-risk return ED visit was defined as a revisit within 72 h of the index visit with ICU admission, receiving emergency surgery, or with in-hospital cardiac arrest during the return ED visit. Time-varying factors associated with a return visit were identified.
Main results: There were 440 281 adult index visits, of which 19 675 (4.5%) return visits occurred within 72 h. Of them, 417 (0.1%) were high-risk revisits. Multivariable analysis showed that time-varying factors associated with an increased risk of high-risk revisits included the following: arrival by ambulance, dyspnea, or chest pain on ED presentation, triage level 1 or 2, acute change in levels of consciousness, tachycardia (>90/min), and high fever (>39°C).
Conclusions: We found a relatively small fraction of discharges (0.1%) developed serious adverse events during the return ED visits. We identified symptom-based and vital sign-based warning signs that may be used for patient self-monitoring at home, as well as new-onset signs during the return visit to alert healthcare providers for timely management of these high-risk revisits.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Duseja R, Bardach NS, Lin GA, Yazdany J, Dean ML, Clay TH, et al. Revisit rates and associated costs after an emergency department encounter: a multistate analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:750–756.
-
- Lu TC, Ling DA, Tsai CL, Shih FY, Fang CC. Emergency department revisits: a nation-wide database analysis on the same and different hospital revisits. Eur J Emerg Med 2020; 27:114–120.
-
- Rising KL, Victor TW, Hollander JE, Carr BG. Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve. Acad Emerg Med 2014; 21:864–871.
-
- Abualenain J, Frohna WJ, Smith M, Pipkin M, Webb C, Milzman D, Pines JM. The prevalence of quality issues and adverse outcomes among 72-hour return admissions in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2013; 45:281–288.
-
- Cheng J, Shroff A, Khan N, Jain S. Emergency department return visits resulting in admission: do they reflect quality of care? Am J Med Qual 2016; 31:541–551.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
