Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 30:259-267.
doi: 10.1111/hir.12376. Online ahead of print.

Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: A retrospective cohort study

Vaibhav Aggarwal  1
Affiliations
Free article

Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: A retrospective cohort study

Vaibhav Aggarwal. Health Info Libr J. .
Free article

Abstract

Background and objective: We examined whether the use of visual abstracts on social media platforms can improve comprehensive social media and conventional metrics such as total altmetric attention score, full text page views and citation counts (study outcomes) through retrospective cohort study.

Methods: We included all original research articles (Total 307 articles: N = 69 in visual abstract group and N = 238 in control group) published between July 2018 and January 2019 in the JAMA, BMJ and the NEJM and used negative binomial regression to adjust for article characteristics.

Results: Adjusted analysis showed no significant differences between articles with and without visual abstracts in the altmetric attention score (p = 0.37) and in number of page views (p = 0.44). Citations in the Web of Science core collection were found to be statistically significant favouring control group (p = 0.028). We also found no significant differences in altmetric attention score and page views after stratification for article type [randomised controlled trial (RCT) vs. non-RCT]. Citations counts were found to be borderline significant for RCT (p = 0.04) and non-significant for non-RCT.

Conclusion: Visual abstracts might not be effective in disseminating scientific research. We should look at other innovative ways to improve the visibility of the research.

Keywords: abstracting and indexing; information dissemination; publishers and publishing; research impact; social media; statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Borkin, M. A., Bylinskii, Z., Kim, N. W., Bainbridge, C. M., Yeh, C. S., Borkin, D., Pfister, H., & Oliva, A. (2016). Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732.
    1. Borkin, M. A., Vo, A. A., Bylinskii, Z., Isola, P., Sunkavalli, S., Oliva, A., & Pfister, H. (2013). What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2306-2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234.
    1. Bredbenner, K., & Simon, S. M. (2019). Video abstracts and plain language summaries are more effective than graphical abstracts and published abstracts. PLoS One, 14(11), e0224697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224697.
    1. Chapman, S. J., Grossman, R. C., FitzPatrick, M. E. B., & Brady, R. R. W. (2019). Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media. BJS, 106(12), 1611-1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11307.
    1. Fox, C. S., Bonaca, M. A., Ryan, J. J., Massaro, J. M., Karen, B., & Joseph, L. (2015). A randomized trial of social media from circulation. Circulation, 131(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013509.

LinkOut - more resources