Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;103(7):464-470.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7058.

Burnout within UK surgical specialties: a systematic review

B Balendran  1 , M F Bath  2 , A I Awopetu  1   3 , S M Kreckler  3
Affiliations

Burnout within UK surgical specialties: a systematic review

B Balendran et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Burnout is of growing concern within the surgical workforce, having been shown to result in reduced job satisfaction, decreased patient satisfaction and higher rates of medical errors. Determining the extent of burnout and identifying its risk factors within UK surgical practice is essential to ensure appropriate interventions can be implemented to improve mental wellbeing.

Materials: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and Cochrane databases was performed, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between January 2000 and October 2019 that reported prevalence data or risk factors on burnout for surgeons working within the UK and/or the Republic of Ireland were included.

Findings: Ten papers met the inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of burnout amongst surgeons in the UK was 32.0% (IQR 28.9-41.0%), with surgical trainees having the highest prevalence (59.0%) of burnout documented for any subgroup. The most common risk factors identified for burnout were younger surgeon age and lower clinical grade. Being married or living with a partner was found to be protective.

Conclusions: Burnout is highly prevalent in UK surgical specialties, mostly amongst surgical trainees. Targeted pre-emptive interventions based upon relevant risk factors for burnout should be prioritised, at both individual and institutional levels.

Keywords: Burnout; Mental wellbeing; Surgery; Trainee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Freudenberger HJ. Staff burn-out. J Soc Issues 1974; 30: 159–165. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x - DOI
    1. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav 1981; 2: 99–113. 10.1002/job.4030020205 - DOI
    1. O’Kelly F, Manecksha RP, Quinlan DMet al. Rates of self-reported “burnout” and causative factors amongst urologists in Ireland and the UK: a comparative cross-sectional study. BJU Int 2016; 117: 363–372. 10.1111/bju.13218 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guditus CW. Staff Burnout: Job Stress in the Human Services Cary Cherniss Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1980, 199 pp. J Teach Educ 1981; 32: 55–56. 10.1177/002248718103200418 - DOI
    1. Aldrees T, Badri M, Islam T, Alqahtani K. Burnout among otolaryngology residents in Saudi Arabia: a multicenter study. J Surg Educ 2015; 72: 844–848. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.02.006 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms