Rehabilitation and lumbar surgery: the French recommendations for clinical practice
- PMID: 34192564
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101548
Rehabilitation and lumbar surgery: the French recommendations for clinical practice
Abstract
Background: Indications and techniques of rehabilitation differ widely across types of lumbar surgery, including timing (before or after surgery) and prescriptions (surgeons but also medical or paramedical professionals).
Objectives: This project aimed to build consensual recommendations for practice in this context.
Methods: The SOFMER methodology was used to establish recommendations for physical medicine and rehabilitation: a steering committee defined the types of lumbar surgery involved and developed the main questions to be addressed; a scientific committee performed a literature review for grading evidence and proposed the first version of recommendations, which were discussed during a dedicated session at the national Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine congress; then an e-Delphi method with cross-professional experts was used to finalise recommendations and reach a multidisciplinary consensus.
Results: The main questions developed were the value of rehabilitation before and after surgery, timing and type of rehabilitation, benefit of supervision and instrumental rehabilitation, value of patient education, and complementary interventions concerning rehabilitation for discectomy, fusion, and disc prosthesis (excluding decompression for spinal stenosis). The literature review identified 60 articles, but for several of the questions, no article in the literature addressed the issue. The multidisciplinary scientific committee analysed the literature and addressed the questions to propose the first version of a set of 23 recommendations. The congress session failed to answer all questions or to reach consensus for all items. After a three-step e-Delphi, 20 recommendations were retained, for which consensus among experts was reached. The recommendations are applicable only to patients without a neurological lesion.
Conclusions: These recommendations provide important and consensual knowledge to assist clinicians in decision-making for rehabilitation in lumbar surgery. Despite many of the recommendations relying exclusively on expert opinion rather than published evidence, this approach is an important advance to improve concordance among healthcare professionals.
Keywords: Discectomy; Fusion; Low back pain; Lumbar spine; Prosthesis; Rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors who contributed significantly to the recommendations have declared their competing interest: Calmels Paul (consulting fees for Thuasne); Dufour Xavier (consulting for the French National Health Insurance, consulting fees for Thuasne); Coudeyre Emmanuel (consulting for Thuasne); Dupeyron Arnaud (consulting fees for Thuasne); Henrontin Yves (consulting fees for Thuasne); Kouyoumdjian Pascal (consulting fees for Stryker and Lepine, Designer for Euros); Rannou François: Consulting fees for low back pain from the French High Authority of Health and the French National Health Insurance).
Similar articles
-
Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013 Feb;84(349):1-35. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.753565. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013. PMID: 23427903
-
Postoperative Care Pathways Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Results of a Modified Delphi Approach.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44 Suppl 24:S1-S12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003276. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31790063
-
Establishing recommendations for physical medicine and rehabilitation: the SOFMER methodology.Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007 Mar;50(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 19. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007. PMID: 17306408 Review. English, French.
-
Survey of postoperative practices for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among canadian spinal surgeons and rehabilitation professionals.N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Mar 6;22:100600. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100600. eCollection 2025 Jun. N Am Spine Soc J. 2025. PMID: 40236877 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic low back pain: Relevance of a new classification based on the injury pattern.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Apr;105(2):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.021. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30792166 Review.
Cited by
-
Guiding significance of the autophagy intensity of lumbar intervertebral discs and the Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting the postoperative curative effect of patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation.Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03539-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40467648 Free PMC article.
-
Physical therapies after surgery for lumbar disc herniation- evidence synthesis from 55 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 4,311 patients.Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 13;5:104238. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104238. eCollection 2025. Brain Spine. 2025. PMID: 40165991 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources