Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jul 1;50(1):41.
doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00527-9.

Systematic and other reviews: criteria and complexities

Affiliations
Editorial

Systematic and other reviews: criteria and complexities

Robert T Sataloff et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354(9193):1896–1900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green S, Higgins J, editors. Glossary. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2005.
    1. PRISMA 2009 Checklist. PRISMA-Statement.org. http://prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA%202009%20checklist.pdf. Accessed 1/19/2021.

Publication types