Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;23(1):119-127.

We Cannot Win the Access to Medicines Struggle Using the Same Thinking That Causes the Chronic Access Crisis

Affiliations

We Cannot Win the Access to Medicines Struggle Using the Same Thinking That Causes the Chronic Access Crisis

Gaëlle Krikorian et al. Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The inequity in access to COVID-19 vaccines that we are witnessing today is yet another symptom of a pharmaceutical economy that is not fit for purpose. That it was possible to develop multiple COVID-19 vaccines in less than a year, while at the same time fostering extreme inequities, calls for transformative change in the health innovation and access ecosystem. Brought into the spotlight through the AIDS drugs access crisis, challenges in accessing lifesaving medicines and vaccines-because they are either not available or inaccessible due to excessive pricing-are being faced by people all over the world. To appreciate the underlying framing of current access discussions, it is important to understand past trends in global health policies and the thinking behind the institutions and mechanisms that were designed to solve access problems. Contrary to what might be expected, certain types of solutions intrinsically carry the conditions that enable scarcity, rationing, and inequity, and lead us away from ensuring the right to health. Analyzing the root causes of access problems and the political economy that allows them to persist and even become exacerbated is necessary to fix access inequities today and to design better solutions to ensure equitable access to health technologies in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Ford N., Calmy A., Mills E. J. “The first decade of antiretroviral therapy in Africa,”. Globalization and Health. 2011;7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heywood M., Altman D. “Confronting AIDS: Human rights, law, and social transformation,”. Health and Human Rights Journal. 2000;5(1):149–179. - PubMed
    1. Ford N., Wilson D., Costa Chaves G. et al. “Sustaining access to antiretroviral therapy in the less-developed world: Lessons from Brazil and Thailand,”. AIDS. 2007;21(4):S21–S29. Suppl. - PubMed
    1. Hogg R., Cahn P., Katabira E. T. et al. “Time to act: Global apathy towards HIV/AIDS is a crime against humanity,”. Lancet. 2002;360(9347):1710–1711. - PubMed
    1. Meier B. M., Gelpi A., Kavanagh M. M. et al. “Employing human rights frameworks to realize access to an HIV cure,”. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2015;18(1) - PMC - PubMed

Substances