Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 26;13(6):155-162.
doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i6.155.

A Novel guide extension assisted stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions

Affiliations
Review

A Novel guide extension assisted stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions

Shams Y-Hassan et al. World J Cardiol. .

Abstract

A challenging technical scenario frequently encountered in a percutaneous coronary intervention of a coronary bifurcation lesion (CBL) is stent implantation of only the stenosed segment without compromising the other two normal segments in non-true bifurcation lesions. Another is precise stent implantation covering the side branch ostium without leaving excessive stent metal at the other two segments of a bifurcation lesion in complex true bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to describe a novel stenting technique for both non-true and true CBLs by using a guide extension catheter (GuideLiner). With the assistance of a guide extension catheter mounted on both the main and the side-branch guidewires and with its intubation down to the bifurcation carina, a stent can be implanted in the side branch segment or distal main segment of the bifurcation lesion appropriately without compromising the other two segments of the coronary bifurcation. Stent implantation is described in three bifurcation lesions in three cases and shown in detail with illustrative figures. The technique facilitates side-branch only stenting in side-branch mono-ostial (medina 0, 0, 1) CBL or only the distal main segment in distal mono-ostial (medina 0, 1, 0) CBL without compromising the other two remaining segments when using the one-stent technique in non-true CBLs without leaving unnecessary excessive stent metal at the bifurcation site and when using a two-stent technique in complex true bifurcation lesions (tri-ostial or medina 1, 1, 1). Consequently, through optimizing stent deployment, the technique may have the potential to reduce the risk of subacute stent thrombosis and future in-stent restenosis. The most appropriate lesions suitable for the technique, and some other practical tips are also described.

Keywords: Coronary bifurcation lesion; GuideLiner stenting; Medina classification; Novel descriptive, intelligible and ordered classification; One- or two-stenting technique; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic description of the guide extension-assisted technique in a coronary bifurcation lesion in the first case. A: Coronary angiography in a male patient admitted with unstable angina revealed a significant ostial and proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis. It was classified as side branch mono-ostial (medina 0, 0, 1), left main stem/left circumflex artery (LCx)/LAD bifurcation stenosis (orange arrow). Evaluation by fractional flow reserve assessment was 0.76, indicating a significant stenosis. The guide extension-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention technique is demonstrated schematically. B: Two guide wires are placed in the left coronary artery (both LAD and LCx); C: After conventional pre-dilatation, the GuideLiner, mounted on both guidewires, is placed proximal to the tip of the mother guide catheter (orange arrow); D: The stent is introduced just distal to the stenosis; E: The GuideLiner is then advanced to the carina of the bifurcation and the stent is pulled back to a level where the proximal radio-opaque marker of the stent balloon overlaps the radio-opaque marker just proximal to the tip of the guide-liner (orange arrow). Because the GuideLiner is mounted on both wires, the carina of the bifurcation will prevent further introduction of the GuideLiner into the LAD or LCx; F: The stent is implanted slowly. Note that the GuideLiner is pushed backwards when the stent balloon is inflated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Annotated description of the guide extension technique in the bifurcation lesion in the first case. A and B: Left (A) and right (B) coronary angiography of the same patient in figure 1 showing stenosis at the ostium and proximal part of left anterior descending artery (LAD) (A, orange arrow); C and D: After engagement of the left coronary artery with 7F XB 3.5 guide catheter, a 7F GuideLiner, mounted on both guidewires, is advanced carefully against the carina of the bifurcation and the stent is placed at the stenosis site with the proximal radio-opaque marker of the stent balloon overlapping the radio-opaque marker just proximal to the tip of the GuideLiner (D, under contrast injection); E: A 3.5 mm × 15 mm stent was implanted with a pressure of 20 atm; note that the GuideLiner is pushed backwards during stent implantation. The stent is post-dilated in the conventional way; F: The proximal stent edge can be seen accurately placed at the ostium using StentBoost imaging (orange arrows); G: Final result, stent implanted in the LAD without compromising the left main stem or the left circumflex artery ostium. LCA: Left coronary artery; RCA: Right coronary artery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Demonstration of the guide extension technique during percutaneous coronary intervention of the bifurcation lesion of the second case. A: Left coronary artery (LCA) angiography reveals a stenosis in the obtuse marginal branch, (orange arrow) that was stented first after engagement of the left coronary artery with 7F-XB 3.5 guide catheter. There is also a distal mono-ostial (medina 0, 1, 0) left anterior descending artery (LAD)/diagonal bifurcation stenosis (white arrow), which was stented with the guide extension-assisted technique; B: Of note, angiography to visualize the angle between the diagonal branch and the distal segment of the main branch (LAD) was ambiguous, making it especially suitable for this novel technique. The GuideLiner, mounted on both the LAD and diagonal guidewires, was introduced to the carina site of the bifurcation. A Promus Premier 3.0 mm × 16 mm stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) positioned at the stenosis with the proximal stent balloon radio-opaque marker positioned on the GuideLiner radio-opaque marker just proximal to the tip of the GuideLiner (white arrow); C: The stent was implanted at a pressure of 22 atm; D: Angiographic final result (white and orange arrows); E and F: The implanted stent, checked by using OCT, is well-apposed to the vessel wall; the proximal stent edge can be seen positioned at the ostium of the distal segment of the main branch (E, white arrow), and no stent struts are seen to cover the diagonal branch ostium (F, white arrow). OCT: Optical coherence tomography.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Demonstration of the guide extension technique in a complex true bifurcation lesion in the third case. A and B: Left (A) and right (B) coronary angiography. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) system reveals a proximal tri-ostial (medina 1, 1, 1) LAD/diagonal bifurcation stenosis where the LAD is subtotally occluded (thick orange arrows); B: The distal part of the LAD is filled by collateral circulation from the right coronary artery (thick orange arrow); C: The left coronary artery engaged with 7F-XB 3.5 guide catheter. After placing two guidewires, one in the LAD and another in the diagonal artery, and then conventional predilatation of both the main and the side branches, the GuideLiner, mounted on both guidewires, is positioned at the bifurcation carina. A Promus Premier (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) 2.5 mm × 16 mm stent is placed in the diagonal artery; D and E: The stent is retracted so that the proximal stent balloon radio-opaque marker overlaps the radio-opaque marker just proximal to the tip of the GuideLiner (D: Without contrast; E: With contrast; orange arrows); F: The stent was implanted at a pressure of 22 atm; the stent balloon pushes the guide extension catheter backwards; G: StentBoost imaging (Philips Medical Systems, Eindoven, the Netherlands) shows that the proximal stent edge is positioned at the side-branch ostium. After stent implantation in the main branch with a Promus Premier (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) 3.0 mm × 24 mm stent post-dilated with a 3.5 mm high pressure balloon, rewiring of the side branch, sequential balloon dilatation, proximal optimization technique, and final kissing balloon inflation; H: StentBoost imaging reveals a precisely stented bifurcation lesion without unnecessary layers of struts; I and J: Optical coherence tomography confirmed a well-apposed stent and no struts covering the ostium of the diagonal artery (orange arrows); K: Final result (orange arrow). LCA: Left coronary artery; RCA: Right coronary artery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collet C, Mizukami T, Grundeken MJ. Contemporary techniques in percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16:725–734. - PubMed
    1. Huang F, Luo ZC. Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush vs provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen E, Cai W, Chen LL. Crush vs Culotte stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with long-term follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14865. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Y-Hassan S, Lindroos MC, Sylvén C. A novel stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:903–909. - PubMed
    1. Y-Hassan S, Lindroos MC, Sylvén C. A Novel Descriptive, Intelligible and Ordered (DINO) classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Review of current classifications. Circ J. 2011;75:299–305. - PubMed