Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 25;55(4):898-906.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00381-x. eCollection 2021 Aug.

A Surgical Protocol for Management of Post Traumatic Heterotopic Ossification of Elbow

Affiliations

A Surgical Protocol for Management of Post Traumatic Heterotopic Ossification of Elbow

Dheenadhayalan Jayamaraju et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Background: Open excision remains the gold standard of treatment for posttraumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome of early surgical excision done by adhering to a proposed surgical protocol with exclusive posttraumatic HO of the elbow.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 31 patients (25 males and 6 females) with a mean follow-up of 40.5 ± 27.44 months. Excision was done according to our surgical protocol based on the location of HO, associated fractures, stability, need for ulnar nerve transposition, previous operative scar. Improvement in elbow function, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) preoperatively and at final follow-up was compared, and statistical analysis was done.

Results: Mean flexion-extension arc, supination-pronation arc and MEPS improved by 74.68° ± 29.32°, 26.13° ± 32.93°, 30.48 ± 11.57, respectively. Flexion arc deteriorated by 10.81° ± 10.42° from intraoperative to final follow-up. Improvement at final follow-up was significant in all the cases (P < 0.05). 19 patients had limited HO, and 12 had global HO. Their mean flexion-extension arc increase was 77.63° ± 29.12° and 70° ± 30.3° respectively, and the final mean MEPS score was 96.05 ± 5.16 and 88.75 ± 11.51, respectively. Nine patients had no initial fracture (Group 1), 13 had some fracture (Group 2), nine had a fracture-dislocation of the elbow (Group 3). Their flexion-extension improvement, final MEPS were 88.33° ± 30.82°, 98.33 ± 5, (Group 1); 81.15° ± 16.73°, 92.31 ± 9.27 (Group 2) and 51.67° ± 31.32°, 89.44 ± 9.5 (Group 3), respectively. We had two complications (6.45%).

Conclusion: The surgical protocol described here enabled us to achieve good functional results and was in concordance with similar studies done previously.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00381-x.

Keywords: Elbow stiffness; HO excision; Heterotopic ossification; Surgical protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Use of extension blocking splint. a Showing full active flexion possible by patient. b Showing terminal 30° extension blocking in the unstable elbow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of results among various groups of heterotopic ossification. ROM range of movement, INTRA-OP ROM range of movement at the end of surgery on the operating table, MEPS Mayo elbow performance score
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a, b AP and lateral view radiographs of elbow showing olecranon fracture. c, d Radiographs at 6 months following injury showing united olecranon fracture by tension band wiring and predominantly medical, posterior HO. eh Pre-operative extension is 70°, flexion is upto 90°, supination is upto 90° and pronation upto 50°. il At final follow-up extension is 0°, flexion is upto 130°, supination is upto 90° and pronation upto 60°
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a, b AP and lateral view radiographs of elbow showing olecranon fracture. c, d Radiographs at 6 months following injury showing united olecranon fracture by tension band wiring and predominantly medical, posterior HO. eh Pre-operative extension is 70°, flexion is upto 90°, supination is upto 90° and pronation upto 50°. il At final follow-up extension is 0°, flexion is upto 130°, supination is upto 90° and pronation upto 60°

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morrey, B. F., & Sanchez-Sotelo, J. (2010). The elbow and its disorders, 4th edn. In Morrey, B., & Sanchez-Sotelo, J. (Eds.) Bone (p. 472–483).
    1. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Excision of heterotopic bone around the elbow. Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery. 2004;8(1):25–33. doi: 10.1097/00130911-200403000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morrey BF, An K-N. Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 4. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 88.
    1. Viola RW, Hastings H. Treatment of ectopic ossification about the elbow. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2000;370:65–86. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200001000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandelli C, Baiguini M. Ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy at the elbow: Decisional algorithm and surgical considerations. Neurocirugia. 2009;20(1):31–38. doi: 10.1016/S1130-1473(09)70191-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources