Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):836-845.
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab114.

Left ventricular function, strain, and infarct characteristics in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions

Affiliations
Observational Study

Left ventricular function, strain, and infarct characteristics in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions

Ahmet Demirkiran et al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. .

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to explore cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left ventricular (LV) function, strain, and infarct size characteristics in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (TSTEMI) compared to patients with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively).

Methods and results: In total, 407 patients were enrolled in this multicentre observational prospective cohort study. All patients underwent CMR examination 2-8 days after the index event. CMR cine imaging was performed for functional assessment and late gadolinium enhancement to determine infarct size and identify microvascular obstruction (MVO). TSTEMI patients demonstrated the highest LV ejection fraction and the most preserved global LV strain (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial) across the three groups (overall P ≤ 0.001). The CMR-defined infarction was less frequently observed in TSTEMI than in STEMI patients [77 (65%) vs. 124 (98%), P < 0.001] but was comparable with NSTEMI patients [77 (65%) vs. 66 (70%), P = 0.44]. A remarkably smaller infarct size was seen in TSTEMI compared to STEMI patients [1.4 g (0.0-3.9) vs. 13.5 g (5.3-26.8), P < 0.001], whereas infarct size was not significantly different from that in NSTEMI patients [1.4 g (0.0-3.9) vs. 2.1 g (0.0-8.6), P = 0.06]. Whilst the presence of MVO was less frequent in TSTEMI compared to STEMI patients [5 (4%) vs. 53 (31%), P < 0.001], no significant difference was seen compared to NSTEMI patients [5 (4%) vs. 5 (5%), P = 0.72].

Conclusion: TSTEMI yielded favourable cardiac LV function, strain, and infarct-related scar mass compared to STEMI and NSTEMI. LV function and infarct characteristics of TSTEMI tend to be more similar to NSTEMI than STEMI.

Keywords: cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; infarct size; myocardial tissue characteristics; strain; transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of post-infarct cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived function and volume characteristics across three main myocardial infarction types (STEMI, TSTEMI, and NSTEMI). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TSTEMI, transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of post-infarct cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived global LV strain characteristics across three main myocardial infarction types (STEMI, TSTEMI, and NSTEMI). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. LV, left ventricle; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TSTEMI, transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived infarct characteristics across three main myocardial infarction types (STEMI, TSTEMI, and NSTEMI). Data are shown as percentage or median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3) with Tukey method. CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricle; MVO, microvascular obstruction; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TSTEMI, transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representation of typical findings of ECG, CAG, and CMR for all myocardial infarction types including STEMI (top), TSTEMI (middle), and NSTEMI (bottom). On the left side, an initial ECG which was taken after the first medical contact and a Pre-PCI ECG which was performed right before the revascularization procedure, were displayed. In the middle, the angiographic appearances of the culprit arteries were shown and on the right side, acquired short-axis LGE images through infarct core during CMR examination days after the index event were demonstrated. In STEMI and NSTEMI, dynamic characteristic ECG changes (e.g. negative T-waves and ST elevations) are seen throughout the MI process. However, in TSTEMI, complete normalization of ST elevations in the Pre-PCI ECG is noted. Concerning CAG, while STEMI exhibits a total occlusion, TSTEMI and NSTEMI are presented with a partly occluded lesion with a residual flow. On the LGE images, in STEMI, a large amount of scar tissue (arrow) and as well as MVO (asterisk) are observed. However, in NSTEMI, a relatively small amount of scar tissue without MVO is noted and in TSTEMI, even a smaller amount of scar mass without MVO is marked. ECG, electrocardiography; CAG, coronary angiography; CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; MVO, microvascular obstruction; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TSTEMI, transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

References

    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DAet al. ; Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2231–64. - PubMed
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno Het al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77. - PubMed
    1. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthelemy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DLet al. . 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021;42:1289–367. - PubMed
    1. Badings EA, Remkes WS, The SH, Dambrink JE, Tjeerdsma G, Rasoul Set al. . Early or late intervention in patients with transient ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: subgroup analysis of the ELISA-3 trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;88:755–64. - PubMed
    1. Terkelsen CJ, Norgaard BL, Lassen JF, Poulsen SH, Gerdes JC, Sloth Eet al. . Potential significance of spontaneous and interventional ST-changes in patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: observations from the ST-MONitoring in Acute Myocardial Infarction study (The MONAMI study). Eur Heart J 2006;27:267–75. - PubMed

Publication types