Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253939.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253939. eCollection 2021.

Determinants of crop residue burning practice in the Terai region of Nepal

Affiliations

Determinants of crop residue burning practice in the Terai region of Nepal

Sugat B Bajracharya et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The open burning of agricultural crop residue is a key environmental issue facing the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, the Indo-Gangetic plain in particular. There is a varying intensity in the incidence of open agricultural burning in this region, and multiple drivers that determine why farmers in this region decide to burn their crop residues. While there have been research studies conducted for other countries in the region, research into the determinants of crop-burning in the Nepalese context is missing. Using primary data from a survey of 388 farming households across three districts of the Nepal Terai-Nawalparasi, Rupandehi and Kapilvastu-applying a recursive bivariate probit model, this study seeks to find out what drives the Nepalese farmers to burn their crop residue instead of using them in a sustainable manner and suggest policy recommendations for mitigation. Our findings show that the major determining factors that influence the farmers' behavior in Nepal are livestock ownership, combine harvester use and awareness level of the farmers. While the effects of crop residue burning is transboundary in nature, the mitigation measures require to be region specific. Based on the findings, the study proposes raising livestock, using technology like Happy Seeders or upgrade the combine harvesters, raising awareness and changing perception of farmers, and promoting alternative uses of crop residue as viable mitigation measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Trends in the start of combine harvester use and open residue burning.

References

    1. Saikawa E, Panday A, Kang S, Gautam R, Zusman E, Cong Z, et al.. Air Pollution in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. In: Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha AB, editors. The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment: Mountains, Climate Change, Sustainability and People. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 339–387. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_10 - DOI
    1. Cassou E. Field Burning Agricultural Pollution. World Bank, 2018. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29504.
    1. Ramanathan V, Carmichael G. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat Geosci. 2008;1: 221–227. doi: 10.1038/ngeo156 - DOI
    1. Bhuvaneshwari S, Hettiarachchi H. Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions. 2019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050832 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pant K. Monetary Incentives to Reduce Open-Field Rice-Straw Burning in the Plains of Nepal. 2014.

Publication types