Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 5;9(6):83.
doi: 10.3390/sports9060083.

Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach

Affiliations
Review

Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach

Benjamin H Gleason et al. Sports (Basel). .

Abstract

Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex-performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and psychosocial. This reality may be vexing to the strength and conditioning coach, who, as a service provider, must answer to sport coaches about an athlete's progress. Recently an evaluation mechanism for strength and conditioning coaches was proposed, in part to help coaches establish their effectiveness within the organization. Without formal guidance and realistic expectations, if an athlete is not bigger, leaner, stronger, etc. as a result of training within a specified timeframe, blame is often placed upon the strength and conditioning coach. The purpose of this article is to explore possible causes of what may be perceived as athlete non-responses to training and to provide guidance for the coach on how to handle those issues within their domain. A process of investigation is recommended, along with resources to assist coaches as they consider a broad range of issues, including enhancing existing testing methods, improving athlete behaviors, and adjusting processes designed to bring about performance improvement.

Keywords: coach evaluation; high performance; sport performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of investigation and intervention.

References

    1. Ishida A., Rochau K., Findlay K.P., Devero B., Duca M., Stone M. Effects of initial muscle strength level on sports performance changes in collegiate soccer players. Sports. 2020;8:127. doi: 10.3390/sports8090127. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Latella C., Teo W.-P., Spathis J., van den Hoek D. Long-term strength adaptation: A 15-year analysis of powerlifting athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020;34:2412–2418. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003657. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller T.A., White E.D., Kinley K.A., Congleton J.J., Clark M.J. The effects of training history, player position, and body composition on exercise performance in collegiate football players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2002;16:44–49. - PubMed
    1. Montero D., Lundby C. Refuting the myth of non-response to exercise training: ‘Non-responders’ do respond to higher dose of training. J. Physiol. 2017;595:3377–3387. doi: 10.1113/JP273480. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timmons J.A. Variability in training-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011;110:846–853. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00934.2010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed