Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jun 27;18(13):6892.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136892.

Nurse-Coordinated Blood Pressure Telemonitoring for Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Nurse-Coordinated Blood Pressure Telemonitoring for Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Woo-Seok Choi et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has put hypertensive patients in densely populated cities at increased risk. Nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring (NC-HBPT) may help address this. We screened studies published in English on three databases, from their inception to 30 November 2020. The effects of NC-HBPT were compared with in-person treatment. Outcomes included changes in blood pressure (BP) following the intervention and rate of BP target achievements before and during COVID-19. Of the 1916 articles identified, 27 comparisons were included in this review. In the intervention group, reductions of 5.731 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 4.120-7.341; p < 0.001) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 2.342 mmHg (1.482-3.202; p < 0.001) in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were identified. The rate of target BP achievement was significant in the intervention group (risk ratio, RR = 1.261, 1.154-1.378; p < 0.001). The effects of intervention over time showed an SBP reduction of 3.000 mmHg (-5.999-11.999) before 2000 and 8.755 mmHg (5.177-12.334) in 2020. DBP reduced by 2.000 mmHg (-2.724-6.724) before 2000 and by 3.529 mmHg (1.221-5.838) in 2020. Analysis of the target BP ratio before 2010 (RR = 1.101, 1.013-1.198) and in 2020 (RR = 1.906, 1.462-2.487) suggested improved BP control during the pandemic. NC-HBPT more significantly improves office blood pressure than UC among urban hypertensive patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; blood pressure; coordination; hypertension; nurse; telemonitoring; urban.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Cumulative meta-analysis presenting the summative effect at each time point. Note. SBP, systolic blood pressure; UC, usual care; NC-HBPT, nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring; Summary effect size (); Point estimate of individual study (●).
Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the selection of studies included in the systematic review. Note. HBPT, home blood pressure telemonitoring; RCT, randomized controlled trial; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BP, blood pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Funnel plot of systolic blood pressure by Hedges’ g (plot observed and imputed), random effects model. Notes. Summary effect size (◇); Summary effect size of imputed studies (◆); Individual studies (○).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot of diastolic blood pressure by Hedges’ g (plot observed and imputed), random effects model. Notes. Summary effect size (◇); Summary effect size of imputed studies (◆); Individual studies (○).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plot of rate of target blood pressure by log risk ratio (plot observed and imputed), random effects model. Notes. Summary effect size (◇); Imputed study (●); Summary effect size of imputed studies (◆); Individual studies (○).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Difference in means of office systolic blood pressure changes by nurse-coordinated intervention. Notes. Point estimate of individual study (); Summary effect size (); SBP, systolic blood pressure; UC, usual care; NC-HBPT, nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Difference in means of office systolic blood pressure changes over time. Notes. Point estimate of individual study (●); Subgroup (); Summary effect size (); DBP, diastolic blood pressure; UC, usual care; NC-HBPT, nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Difference in means of office diastolic blood pressure changes by nurse-coordinated intervention. Notes. Point estimate of individual study (●); Summary effect size (); DBP, diastolic blood pressure; UC, usual care; NC-HBPT, nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Difference in means of office diastolic blood pressure changes over time. Notes. Summary effect size (); Point estimate of individual study (●); Subgroup (); UC, usual care; NC-HBPT, nurse-coordinated home blood pressure telemonitoring.

References

    1. WHO Hypertension. [(accessed on 27 May 2021)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension.
    1. Ostchega Y., Fryar C.D., Nwankwo T., Nguyen D.T. Hypertension Prevalence Among Adults Aged 18 and Over: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, No 364. National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD, USA: 2020. - PubMed
    1. Clark C.E., Smith L.F.P., Taylor R.S., Campbell J.L. Nurse-led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3995. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Egan B.M., Li J., Hutchison F.N., Ferdinand K.C. Hypertension in the United States, 1999 to 2012: Progress toward Healthy People 2020 goals. Circulation. 2014;130:1692–1699. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010676. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chobanian A.V., Bakris G.L., Black H.R., Cushman W.C., Green L.A., Izzo J.L., Jr., Jones D.W., Materson B.J., Oparil S., Wright J.T., Jr., et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. - DOI - PubMed