Outcomes of Bone Marrow Compared to Peripheral Blood for Haploidentical Transplantation

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical (haplo) donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of a matched donor. However, haplo-HCT patients have a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Hence, bone marrow (BM) stem cell source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been routinely used to help mitigate this. Due to ease of collection, peripheral blood (PB) stem cells are increasingly being considered for haplo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients (42 BM and 32 PB) who underwent haplo-HCT at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. Median age at transplant was 60 years (yrs) for BM and 54 yrs for PB, (p = 0.45). There was no difference in OS (p = 0.13) and NRM (p = 0.75) as well as PFS (p = 0.10) or GRFS (p = 0.90) between the groups. The BM cohort showed a 3-year OS rate of 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46-76), and 3-year PFS of 49% (95% CI: 33-63). For the PB group, 3-year OS and PFS were 78% (95% CI: 59-89) and 68% (95% CI: 49-82), respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) (p = 0.31) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.18). Patients receiving BM had a significantly higher risk for relapse with relapse rates by 2 years at 36% (95% CI: 22-50) vs. 16% (95% CI: 6-31) for PB (p = 0.03). The findings from this study suggest that PB is an excellent alternative to BM for haplo-HCT.

Keywords: allogenic transplantation; bone marrow; haploidentical transplantation; peripheral blood.

Figure 1

Comparison of survival outcomes between BM and PB grafts. (A) probability of overall survival, (B) non-relapse mortality, (C) GVHD free relapse free survival, and (D) cumulative incidence of relapse.