Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 2;26(11):3343.
doi: 10.3390/molecules26113343.

In Situ Decarboxylation-Pressurized Hot Water Extraction for Selective Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa. Chemometric Approach

Affiliations

In Situ Decarboxylation-Pressurized Hot Water Extraction for Selective Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa. Chemometric Approach

Yannick Nuapia et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Isolation of the therapeutic cannabinoid compounds from Cannabis Sativa L. (C. Sativa) is important for the development of cannabis-based pharmaceuticals for cancer treatment, among other ailments. The main pharmacological cannabinoids are THC and CBD. However, THC also induces undesirable psychoactive effects. The decarboxylation process converts the naturally occurring acidic forms of cannabinoids, such as cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), to their more active neutral forms, known as cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The purpose of this study was to selectively extract cannabinoids using a novel in situ decarboxylation pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) system. The decarboxylation step was evaluated at different temperature (80-150 °C) and time (5-60 min) settings to obtain the optimal conditions for the decarboxylation-PHWE system using response surface methodology (RSM). The system was optimized to produce cannabis extracts with high CBD content, while suppressing the THC and CBN content. The identification and quantification of cannabinoid compounds were determined using UHPLC-MS/MS with external calibration. As a result, the RSM has shown good predictive capability with a p-value < 0.05, and the chosen parameters revealed to have a significant effect on the CBD, CBN and THC content. The optimal decarboxylation conditions for an extract richer in CBD than THC were set at 149.9 °C and 42 min as decarboxylation temperature and decarboxylation time, respectively. The extraction recoveries ranged between 96.56 and 103.42%, 95.22 and 99.95%, 99.62 and 99.81% for CBD, CBN and THC, respectively.

Keywords: cannabinoid compounds; decarboxylation; green extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted vs. actual values of cannabinoid responses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coefficient plots.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coefficient plots.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3D response surface plot.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3D response surface plot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aladic K., Jarni K., Barbir T., Vidovic S., Vladic J., Bilic M., Jokic S. Supercritical CO2 extraction of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seed oil. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;76:472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.016. - DOI
    1. Rovetto L.J., Aieta N.V. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2017;129:16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.03.014. - DOI
    1. Devi V., Khanam S. Study of ω-6 linoleic and ω-3 α-linolenic acids of hemp (Cannabis sativa) seed oil extracted by supercritical CO2 extraction: CCD optimization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019;7:102818. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.102818. - DOI
    1. Bernstein N., Gorelick J., Koch S. Interplay between chemistry and morphology in medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;129:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.039. - DOI
    1. Moreno T., Montanes F., Tallon S.J., King J. Extraction of cannabinoids from hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) using high pressure solvents: An overview of different processing options. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2020;161:104850. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104850. - DOI