Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 4;11(6):1673.
doi: 10.3390/ani11061673.

Effects of Different Non-Cage Housing Systems on the Production Performance, Serum Parameters and Intestinal Morphology of Laying Hens

Affiliations

Effects of Different Non-Cage Housing Systems on the Production Performance, Serum Parameters and Intestinal Morphology of Laying Hens

Yi Wan et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of plastic-net housing system (NRS) and floor-litter housing system (LRS) on the production performance, serum parameters and intestinal morphology of Shendan laying hens. A total of 1200 30-week-old hens were randomly allocated to the NRS and LRS groups, each of which included five replicates with 120 chickens in each replicate. The experiment was conducted from 32 to 40 weeks of age. Indoor airborne parameters were measured every 2 weeks, and indoor ground contamination was measured monthly. The laying rate and mortality of hens were recorded daily, and egg quality traits and serum parameters were measured every 2 weeks. At 40 weeks of age, four birds per replicate from each experimental group were selected for intestinal morphological observation. The results showed that the airborne bacteria number in the LRS was significantly higher than that in the NRS (p < 0.05) for most of the experimental period (except at 32 and 38 weeks of age), and the bacterial numbers on the surfaces of the floor and floor eggs in the LRS were approximately 10 times higher than those in the NRS (p < 0.05). Compared with the LRS, the NRS improved the laying rate (p < 0.05), reduced serum malondialdehyde (MDA) (p < 0.05) and corticosterone (CORT) concentrations and increased serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, indicating favourable effects on antioxidative status. The NRS was significantly associated with an increased villus height (VH), villus height to crypt depth ratio (VCR) in the small intestine (p < 0.05) and increased VCR in the caecum (p < 0.05). Overall, the lower rate of bacterial contamination in the NRS than in the LRS indicated better environmental hygiene. The NRS enhanced the laying performance and antioxidant capacity of hens and was superior to the LRS in improving intestinal health. The current findings support the advantages of the NRS for the health and welfare of Shendan chickens during the peak laying period.

Keywords: intestinal morphology; laying hen; non-cage housing system; production performance; serum parameter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Temperature, relative humidity and CO2 concentration in the two housing system houses. Dotted lines represent the floor-litter housing system (LRS), and solid lines represent the plastic-net housing system (NRS). Lines connected above the bars indicate the standard deviation. wk, week.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The bacterial counts of indoor aerosols in the two housing system houses. NRS, plastic-net housing system; LRS, floor-litter housing system; a,b. Means with different superscripts within each period are significantly different (p < 0.05). Lines connected above the bars indicate the standard deviation. wk, week.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The bacterial counts on the surfaces of the floor, nest eggs and floor eggs in the two housing system houses. NRS, plastic-net housing system; LRS, floor-litter housing system; a,b. Means with different superscripts within each position are significantly different (p < 0.05). Lines connected above the bars indicate the standard deviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Body weights (A) and laying rates (B) of hens in the two housing system houses from 32 to 40 weeks of age. Dotted lines represent the floor-litter housing system (LRS), and solid lines represent the plastic-net housing system (NRS). * Means with asterisk superscripts within each period are significantly different (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Fu D.Z., Zhang D.X., Xu G.Y., Li K.Y., Wang Q., Zhang Z.B., Li J.Y., Chen Y., Jia Y.X., Qu L.J. Effects of different rearing systems on meat production traits and meat fiber microstructure of Beijing-you chicken. Anim. Sci. J. 2015;7:729–735. doi: 10.1111/asj.12347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferrante V., Susanna L., Giuseppe V., Cavalchini L.G. Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;8:165–174. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.165. - DOI
    1. Tauson R. Management and housing systems for layers—Effects on welfare and production. World Poult. Sci. J. 2005;61:477–490. doi: 10.1079/WPS200569. - DOI
    1. Zofia S., Magdalena D., Jadwiga T., Józefa K., Anna A. The effect of the type of non-caged housing system, genotype and age on the behaviour of laying hens. Animals. 2020;10:2450. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almeida E.A., Arantes de Souza L.F., Sant A.C., Bahiense R.N., Macari M., Furlan R.L. Poultry rearing on perforated plastic floors and the effect on air quality, growth performance, and carcass injuries—Experiment 1: Thermal comfort. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:3155–3162. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex131. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources