Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 7;18(11):6172.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116172.

Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game

Affiliations

Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game

Martin Weiß et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In human interactions, the facial expression of a bargaining partner may contain relevant information that affects prosocial decisions. We were interested in whether facial expressions of the recipient in the dictator game influence dictators' behavior. To test this, we conducted an online study (n = 106) based on a modified version of a dictator game. The dictators allocated money between themselves and another person (recipient), who had no possibility to respond to the dictator. Importantly, before the allocation decision, the dictator was presented with the facial expression of the recipient (angry, disgusted, sad, smiling, or neutral). The results showed that dictators sent more money to recipients with sad or smiling facial expressions and less to recipients with angry or disgusted facial expressions compared with a neutral facial expression. Moreover, based on the sequential analysis of the decision and the interaction partner in the preceding trial, we found that decision-making depends upon previous interactions.

Keywords: dictator game; emotional influence; facial expression; social decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of decisions of dictators toward the five different recipient identities. The dots within the boxes indicate the mean per recipient identity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interactions between fixed effects predictors. (A) Two-way interaction between the decision in the preceding trial (previous decision) and recipient identity; (B) Three-way interaction between empathic concern, previous decision, and recipient identity. For the illustration of the latter, we used a median split (median = EUR 5) for previous decision. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Game Theory and Economic Behavior. John Wiley and Sons; New York, NY, USA: 1944.
    1. Weiland S., Hewig J., Hecht H., Mussel P., Miltner W.H.R. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining. Soc. Neurosci. 2012;7:537–551. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.674056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forsythe R., Horowitz J.L., Savin N., Sefton M. Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games Econ. Behav. 1994;6:347–369. doi: 10.1006/game.1994.1021. - DOI
    1. Rodrigues J., Ulrich N., Hewig J. A neural signature of fairness in altruism: A game of theta? Soc. Neurosci. 2014;10:192–205. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.977401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batson C.D. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social Psychological Answer. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1991.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources