Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game
- PMID: 34200370
- PMCID: PMC8201160
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18116172
Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game
Abstract
In human interactions, the facial expression of a bargaining partner may contain relevant information that affects prosocial decisions. We were interested in whether facial expressions of the recipient in the dictator game influence dictators' behavior. To test this, we conducted an online study (n = 106) based on a modified version of a dictator game. The dictators allocated money between themselves and another person (recipient), who had no possibility to respond to the dictator. Importantly, before the allocation decision, the dictator was presented with the facial expression of the recipient (angry, disgusted, sad, smiling, or neutral). The results showed that dictators sent more money to recipients with sad or smiling facial expressions and less to recipients with angry or disgusted facial expressions compared with a neutral facial expression. Moreover, based on the sequential analysis of the decision and the interaction partner in the preceding trial, we found that decision-making depends upon previous interactions.
Keywords: dictator game; emotional influence; facial expression; social decision-making.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Willingness to be the recipient during the dictator game.BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jul 23;15(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06148-3. BMC Res Notes. 2022. PMID: 35870936 Free PMC article.
-
A neural signature of fairness in altruism: a game of theta?Soc Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(2):192-205. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.977401. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Soc Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25350461
-
Experimentally Induced Empathy Has No Impact on Generosity in a Monetarily Incentivized Dictator Game.Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 1;10:337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00337. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30881325 Free PMC article.
-
Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans.Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007 Oct;28(5):662-5. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007. PMID: 17984929
-
How reinforcer type affects choice in economic games.Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 8. Behav Processes. 2007. PMID: 17353099 Review.
Cited by
-
Can deepfakes be used to study emotion perception? A comparison of dynamic face stimuli.Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7674-7690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02443-y. Epub 2024 Jun 4. Behav Res Methods. 2024. PMID: 38834812 Free PMC article.
-
Inducing sad recognition bias: A novel emotional probabilistic reward task and its affective consequences.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 7;19(11):e0291979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291979. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39509427 Free PMC article.
-
Top-down modulation impairs priming susceptibility in complex decision-making with social implications.Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22707-x. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36284155 Free PMC article.
-
Does Self-Control Promote Prosocial Behavior? Evidence from a Longitudinal Tracking Study.Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;9(6):854. doi: 10.3390/children9060854. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35740790 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Game Theory and Economic Behavior. John Wiley and Sons; New York, NY, USA: 1944.
-
- Forsythe R., Horowitz J.L., Savin N., Sefton M. Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games Econ. Behav. 1994;6:347–369. doi: 10.1006/game.1994.1021. - DOI
-
- Batson C.D. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social Psychological Answer. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1991.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources