Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 10;13(12):1930.
doi: 10.3390/polym13121930.

Rare-Earth Oxides as Alternative High-Energy Photon Protective Fillers in HDPE Composites: Theoretical Aspects

Affiliations

Rare-Earth Oxides as Alternative High-Energy Photon Protective Fillers in HDPE Composites: Theoretical Aspects

Kiadtisak Saenboonruang et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

This work theoretically determined the high-energy photon shielding properties of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composites containing rare-earth oxides, namely samarium oxide (Sm2O3), europium oxide (Eu2O3), and gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3), for potential use as lead-free X-ray-shielding and gamma-shielding materials using the XCOM software package. The considered properties were the mass attenuation coefficient (µm), linear attenuation coefficient (µ), half value layer (HVL), and lead equivalence (Pbeq) that were investigated at varying photon energies (0.001-5 MeV) and filler contents (0-60 wt.%). The results were in good agreement (less than 2% differences) with other available programs (Phy-X/PSD) and Monte Carlo particle transport simulation code, namely PHITS, which showed that the overall high-energy photon shielding abilities of the composites considerably increased with increasing rare-earth oxide contents but reduced with increasing photon energies. In particular, the Gd2O3/HDPE composites had the highest µm values at photon energies of 0.1, 0.5, and 5 MeV, due to having the highest atomic number (Z). Furthermore, the Pbeq determination of the composites within the X-ray energy ranges indicated that the 10 mm thick samples with filler contents of 40 wt.% and 50 wt.% had Pbeq values greater than the minimum requirements for shielding materials used in general diagnostic X-ray rooms and computerized tomography rooms, which required Pbeq values of at least 1.0 and 1.5 mmPb, respectively. In addition, the comparisons of µm, µ, and HVL among the rare-earth oxide/HDPE composites investigated in this work and other lead-free X-ray shielding composites revealed that the materials developed in this work exhibited comparable X-ray shielding properties in comparison with that of the latter, implying great potential to be used as effective X-ray shielding materials in actual applications.

Keywords: Eu2O3; Gd2O3; HDPE; Sm2O3; X-ray; XCOM; gamma; photon; shielding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
µm values of (a,b) Sm2O3/HDPE, (c,d) Eu2O3/HDPE, and (e,f) Gd2O3/HDPE composites with filler contents of 0, 20, 40, and 60 wt.%, determined at photon energies of (a,c,e) 0.001–0.2 MeV and (b,d,f) 0.2–5 MeV using XCOM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
µm values of Sm2O3, Eu2O3, Gd2O3, and HDPE showing K-edge and L-edge behaviors of Sm, Eu, and Gd at photon energies of (a) 0.001–0.2 MeV and (b) 0.03–0.06 MeV.
Figure 3
Figure 3
µm values of Sm2O3/HDPE, Eu2O3/HDPE, and Gd2O3/HDPE composites with filler contents varied from 0–60 wt.%, determined at photon energies of (a) 0.1 MeV, (b) 0.5 MeV, (c) 1 MeV, and (d) 5 MeV using XCOM.
Figure 4
Figure 4
µ values of (a,b) Sm2O3/HDPE, (c,d) Eu2O3/HDPE, and (e,f) Gd2O3/HDPE composites with filler contents of 0, 20, 40, and 60 wt.%, determined at photon energies of (a,c,e) 0.001–0.2 MeV and (b,d,f) 0.2–5 MeV using XCOM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
µ values of Sm2O3/HDPE, Eu2O3/HDPE, and Gd2O3/HDPE composites using XCOM, with filler contents varied from (a,c,e,g) 0–60 wt.%, and (b,d,f,h) 40–60 wt.%, determined at photon energies of (a,b) 0.1 MeV, (c,d) 0.5 MeV, (e,f) 1 MeV, and (g,h) 5 MeV.
Figure 6
Figure 6
HVL values of Sm2O3/HDPE, Eu2O3/HDPE, and Gd2O3/HDPE composites using XCOM, with filler contents varied from (a,c,e,g) 0–60 wt.%, and (b,d,f,h) 40–60 wt.%, determined at photon energies of (a,b) 0.1 MeV, (c,d) 0.5 MeV, (e,f) 1 MeV, and (g,h) 5 MeV.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparative µm values of Sm2O3/HDPE, Eu2O3/HDPE, and Gd2O3/HDPE composites with other common Pb-free HDPE composites (Bi2O3/HDPE, WO3/HDPE, and Fe2O3/HDPE) at filler contents of 20, 40, and 60 wt.% and photon energies of (a) 0.1 MeV, (b) 0.5 MeV, (c) 1 MeV, and (d) 5 MeV.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Comparative µ values of Sm2O3/HDPE, Eu2O3/HDPE, and Gd2O3/HDPE composites with other common Pb-free HDPE composites (Bi2O3/HDPE, WO3/HDPE, and Fe2O3/HDPE) at filler contents of 20, 40, and 60 wt.% and photon energies of (a) 0.1 MeV, (b) 0.5 MeV, (c) 1 MeV, and (d) 5 MeV.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparative HVL values of Sm2O3/HDPE, Eu2O3/HDPE, and Gd2O3/HDPE composites with other common Pb-free HDPE composites (Bi2O3/HDPE, WO3/HDPE, and Fe2O3/HDPE) at filler contents of 20, 40, and 60 wt.% and photon energies of (a) 0.1 MeV, (b) 0.5 MeV, (c) 1 MeV, and (d) 5 MeV.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matsuyama S., Maeshima K., Shimura M. Development of X-ray imaging of intracellular elements and structure. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2020;35:1279–1294. doi: 10.1039/D0JA00128G. - DOI
    1. Sitz A., Hoevels M., Hellerbach A., Gierich A., Luyken K., Dembek T.A., Klehr M., Wirths J., Visser-Vandewalle V., Treuer H. Determining the orientation angle of directional leads for deep brain stimulation using computed tomography and digital x-ray imaging: A phantom study. Med. Phys. 2017;44:4463–4473. doi: 10.1002/mp.12424. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendrick R.E., Tredennick T. Benefit to radiation risk of breast-specific gamma imaging compared with mammography in screening asymptomatic women with dense breasts. Radiology. 2016;281:583–588. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151581. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoshida E., Tashima H., Nagatsu K., Tsuji A., Kamada K., Parodi K., Yamaya T. Whole gamma imaging: A new concept of PET combined with Compton imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2020;65:125013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8e89. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ulukapi K., Ozmen S.F. Study of the effect of irradiation (60Co) on M1 plants of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars and determined [sic] of proper doses for mutation breeding. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018;11:157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2017.12.004. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources