Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jun 8;18(12):6183.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126183.

Stigmatization from Work-Related COVID-19 Exposure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Stigmatization from Work-Related COVID-19 Exposure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Melanie Schubert et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Stigmatization from work-related COVID-19 exposure has not been investigated in detail yet. Therefore, we systematically searched three databases: Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo (until October 2020), and performed a grey literature search (until February 2021). We identified 46 suitable articles from 24 quantitative and 11 qualitative studies, 6 systematic reviews, 3 study protocols and 1 intervention. The assessment of stigmatization varied widely, ranging from a single-item question to a 22-item questionnaire. Studies mostly considered perceived self-stigma (27 of 35 original studies) in healthcare workers (HCWs) or hospital-related jobs (29 of 35). All articles reported on stigmatization as a result of work-related COVID-19 exposure. However, most quantitative studies were characterized by convenience sampling (17 of 24), and all studies-also those with an adequate sampling design-were considered of low methodological quality. Therefore, it is not possible to determine prevalence of stigmatization in defined occupational groups. Nevertheless, the work-related stigmatization of occupational groups with or without suspected contact to COVID-19 is a relevant problem and increases the risk for depression (odds ratio (OR) = 1.74; 95% confidence interval CI 1.29-2.36) and anxiety (OR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.29-2.37). For promoting workers' health, anti-stigma strategies and support should be implemented in the workplace.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV2; bullying; corona; discrimination; healthcare workers; nursing; stigma; work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. Adapted from: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, the PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(6): e1000097, doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of depression (A) and anxiety (B) in association with work-related stigmatization from COVID-19 exposure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Naeem S.B., Bhatti R. The Covid-19 ’infodemic’: A new front for information professionals. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2020;37:233–239. doi: 10.1111/hir.12311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. SPIEGEL Menschen Werfen uns Offenbar vor, wir Hätten die Krankheit ins Dorf Gebracht. [(accessed on 7 September 2020)]; Available online: https://www.spiegel.de/psychologie/stigma-coronavirus-wie-covid-19-die-b....
    1. Heute Z. Die Angst vor der Wut der Mitmenschen. [(accessed on 27 May 2020)]; Available online: https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/panorama/corona-stigma-angst-wut-mitmensc....
    1. Link B.G., Phelan J.C. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2001;27:363–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363. - DOI
    1. Pescosolido B.A., Martin J.K. The stigma complex. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2015;41:87–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145702. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types