Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):186.
doi: 10.3390/bios11060186.

NQS-Doped PDMS Solid Sensor: From Water Matrix to Urine Enzymatic Application

Affiliations

NQS-Doped PDMS Solid Sensor: From Water Matrix to Urine Enzymatic Application

Adrià Martínez-Aviñó et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The development of in situ analytical devices has gained outstanding scientific interest. A solid sensing membrane composed of 1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulfonate (NQS) derivatizing reagent embedded into a polymeric polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composite was proposed for in situ ammonium (NH4+) and urea (NH2CONH2) analysis in water and urine samples, respectively. Satisfactory strategies were also applied for urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of urea, either in solution or glass-supported urease immobilization. Using diffuse reflectance measurements combined with digital image processing of color intensity (RGB coordinates), qualitative and quantitative analyte detection was assessed after the colorimetric reaction took place inside the sensing membrane. A suitable linear relationship was found between the sensor response and analyte concentration, and the results were validated by a thymol-PDMS-based sensor based on the Berthelot reaction. The suggested sensing device offers advantages such as rapidity, versatility, portability, and employment of non-toxic reagents that facilitate in situ analysis in an energy-efficient manner.

Keywords: NQS-PDMS sensor; ammonium; glass support; in-situ analysis; optical sensor; urea; urea hydrolysis; urease; urine; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps of the sol-gel process that takes place for the sensor preparation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NH4+ (50 mg L−1) standard solutions: (a) Variation of the colorimetric signal as a function of the NQS content and exposure time at room temperature. (b) Variation of the analytical signal as a function of the temperature for 5 and 10 min reaction times. (c) Variation of sensor response depending on the SiO2 NP composition tested. (d) Analytical response as a function of the pH and exposure time; inset: images of the sensing device in blank solution (yellow) and NH4+ standard solution 1.5 mg L−1 (brownish) after 5 h exposure time at room temperature. (e,f) SEM images of the synthesized NQS-PDMS sensing membrane, scale bar: 20 µm (e) and 30 µm (f).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Difference in UV-Vis spectra between standards of 2.5 mg L−1 NH4+ (black line), 9 mg L−1 NH4+ coming from hydrolyzed urea (orange line), and 1600 mg L−1 urea (blue line) and the blank standard. (b) Top: Optical microscopy images of the PDMS membrane before (left) and after (right) being exposed to ammonium/urea in solution, scale bar: 20 µm. Bottom: Sensor photos referring to the evolution of the sensor color as a function of ammonium or urea concentration in solution.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic diagram of covalent urease immobilization on a borosilicate glass surface involving surface functionalization with APTMS.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calibration curves for hydrolyzed urea standards (blue) and spiked urine samples (n = 2, orange and grey) for urea catalysis by means of (a) urease enzyme in solution and (b) glass-supported urease immobilization.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ni J.-Q., Diehl C.A., Chai L., Chen Y., Heber A.J., Lim T.-T., Bogan B.W. Factors and characteristics of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter emissions from two manure-belt layer hen houses. Atmos. Environ. 2017;156:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.033. - DOI
    1. Williams Ischer S., Farnell M.B., Tabler G.T., Moreira M., O’Shaughnessy P.T., Nonnenmann M.W. Evaluation of a sprinkler cooling system on inhalable dust and ammonia concentrations in broiler chicken production. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2017;14:40–48. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1211285. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao L., Hadlocon L.J.S., Manuzon R.B., Darr M.J., Keener H.M., Heber A.J., Ni J. Ammonia concentrations and emission rates at a commercial poultry manure composting facility. Biosyst. Eng. 2016;150:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.07.006. - DOI
    1. Zimmerman J.B., Mihelcic J.R., Smith A.J. Global Stressors on Water Quality and Quantity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:4247–4254. doi: 10.1021/es0871457. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li D., Watson C.J., Yan M.J., Lalor S., Rafique R., Hyde B., Lanigan G., Richards K.G., Holden N.M., Humphreys J. A review of nitrous oxide mitigation by farm nitrogen management in temperate grassland-based agriculture. J. Environ. Manag. 2013;128:893–903. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.026. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources