Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 25;10(7):580.
doi: 10.3390/biology10070580.

A Critical Appraisal of Contemporary and Novel Biomarkers in Pheochromocytomas and Adrenocortical Tumors

Affiliations
Review

A Critical Appraisal of Contemporary and Novel Biomarkers in Pheochromocytomas and Adrenocortical Tumors

Marina Tsoli et al. Biology (Basel). .

Abstract

Pheochromocytomas/Paragangliomas (PPGLs) and adrenocortical tumors are rare neoplasms with significant heterogeneity in their biologic and clinical behavior. Current diagnostic and predictive biomarkers include hormone secretion, as well as histopathological and genetic features. PPGL diagnosis is based on biochemical measurement of catecholamines/metanephrines, while histopathological scoring systems have been proposed to predict the risk of malignancy. Adrenocortical tumors are mostly benign, but some can be malignant. Currently, the stage of disease at diagnosis and tumor grade, appear to be the most powerful prognostic factors. However, recent genomic and proteomic studies have identified new genetic and circulating biomarkers, including genes, immunohistochemical markers and micro-RNAs that display high specificity and sensitivity as diagnostic or prognostic tools. In addition, new molecular classifications have been proposed that divide adrenal tumors in distinct subgroups with different clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Ki-67; chromogranin A; genetic; metanephrines; micro-RNA; molecular.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ariton M., Juan C.S., AvRuskin W.T. Pheochromocytoma: Clinical observations from a Brooklyn tertiary hospital. Endocr. Pr. 2000;6:249–252. doi: 10.4158/EP.6.3.249. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lenders J.W., Eisenhofer G., Mannelli M., Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2005;366:665–675. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67139-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumann H.P.H., Young W.F., Jr., Eng C. Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:552–565. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1806651. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khorram-Manesh A., Ahlman H., Nilsson O., Odén A., Jansson S. Mortality associated with pheochromocytoma in a large Swedish cohort. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004;30:556–559. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prejbisz A., Lenders J.W., Eisenhofer G., Januszewicz A. Cardiovascular manifestations of phaeochromocytoma. J. Hypertens. 2011;29:2049–2060. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834a4ce9. - DOI - PubMed