Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 25;11(7):1891.
doi: 10.3390/ani11071891.

A Basic Model to Predict Enteric Methane Emission from Dairy Cows and Its Application to Update Operational Models for the National Inventory in Norway

Affiliations

A Basic Model to Predict Enteric Methane Emission from Dairy Cows and Its Application to Update Operational Models for the National Inventory in Norway

Puchun Niu et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a basic model to predict enteric methane emission from dairy cows and to update operational calculations for the national inventory in Norway. Development of basic models utilized information that is available only from feeding experiments. Basic models were developed using a database with 63 treatment means from 19 studies and were evaluated against an external database (n = 36, from 10 studies) along with other extant models. In total, the basic model database included 99 treatment means from 29 studies with records for enteric CH4 production (MJ/day), dry matter intake (DMI) and dietary nutrient composition. When evaluated by low root mean square prediction errors and high concordance correlation coefficients, the developed basic models that included DMI, dietary concentrations of fatty acids and neutral detergent fiber performed slightly better in predicting CH4 emissions than extant models. In order to propose country-specific values for the CH4 conversion factor Ym (% of gross energy intake partitioned into CH4) and thus to be able to carry out the national inventory for Norway, the existing operational model was updated for the prediction of Ym over a wide range of feeding situations. A simulated operational database containing CH4 production (predicted by the basic model), feed intake and composition, Ym and gross energy intake (GEI), in addition to the predictor variables energy corrected milk yield and dietary concentrate share were used to develop an operational model. Input values of Ym were updated based on the results from the basic models. The predicted Ym ranged from 6.22 to 6.72%. In conclusion, the prediction accuracy of CH4 production from dairy cows was improved with the help of newly published data, which enabled an update of the operational model for calculating the national inventory of CH4 in Norway.

Keywords: dairy cattle; dry matter intake; fatty acid; methane conversion factor; neutral detergent fiber; prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed versus predicted values of enteric CH4 production and the residuals (observed minus predicted) for basic models used in Norway and the Model 3 developed in the present study. The graphs to the left show that the models overestimate CH4 emissions at the lower range and underestimate emissions at the upper range. The graphs to the right show the presence of a linear bias (slope) and the presence of a mean bias (intercept).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed versus predicted values of enteric CH4 production and the residuals (observed minus predicted) for basic models used in Norway and the Model 3 developed in the present study. The graphs to the left show that the models overestimate CH4 emissions at the lower range and underestimate emissions at the upper range. The graphs to the right show the presence of a linear bias (slope) and the presence of a mean bias (intercept).

References

    1. American Meteorological Society An Information Statement of the American Meteorological Society (Adopted by the AMS Council on 15 April 2019) [(accessed on 10 May 2021)];2019 Available online: https://www.ametsoc.org/index.cfm/ams/about-ams/ams-statements/statement...
    1. Hammond K.J., Crompton L.A., Bannink A., Dijkstra J., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R., O’Kiely P., Kebreab E., Eugène M.A., Yu Z., Shingfield K.J., et al. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016;219:13–30. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018. - DOI
    1. Hindrichsen I.K., Wettstein H.-R., Machmüller A., Jörg B., Kreuzer M. Effect of the carbohydrate composition of feed concentrates on methane emission from dairy cows and their slurry. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2005;107:329–350. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-3008-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shibata M., Terada F. Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants. Anim. Sci. J. 2010;81:2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman P. Method and System for Monitoring and Reducing Ruminant Methane Production. No. 7966971B2. U.S. Patent. 2011 Jun 28;

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources