Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 20;10(6):1430.
doi: 10.3390/foods10061430.

Revisiting Non-Thermal Food Processing and Preservation Methods-Action Mechanisms, Pros and Cons: A Technological Update (2016-2021)

Affiliations
Review

Revisiting Non-Thermal Food Processing and Preservation Methods-Action Mechanisms, Pros and Cons: A Technological Update (2016-2021)

James S Chacha et al. Foods. .

Abstract

The push for non-thermal food processing methods has emerged due to the challenges associated with thermal food processing methods, for instance, high operational costs and alteration of food nutrient components. Non-thermal food processing involves methods where the food materials receive microbiological inactivation without or with little direct application of heat. Besides being well established in scientific literature, research into non-thermal food processing technologies are constantly on the rise as applied to a wide range of food products. Due to such remarkable progress by scientists and researchers, there is need for continuous synthesis of relevant scientific literature for the benefit of all actors in the agro-food value chain, most importantly the food processors, and to supplement existing information. This review, therefore, aimed to provide a technological update on some selected non-thermal food processing methods specifically focused on their operational mechanisms, their effectiveness in preserving various kinds of foods, as revealed by their pros (merits) and cons (demerits). Specifically, pulsed electric field, pulsed light, ultraviolet radiation, high-pressure processing, non-thermal (cold) plasma, ozone treatment, ionizing radiation, and ultrasound were considered. What defines these techniques, their ability to exhibit limited changes in the sensory attributes of food, retain the food nutrient contents, ensure food safety, extend shelf-life, and being eco-friendly were highlighted. Rationalizing the process mechanisms about these specific non-thermal technologies alongside consumer education can help raise awareness prior to any design considerations, improvement of cost-effectiveness, and scaling-up their capacity for industrial-level applications.

Keywords: agro-food industry; food preservation; food processors; non-thermal food processing; product development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of non-thermal food processing technologies synthesized (which include: pulsed electric field (PEF), pulsed light (PL), ultraviolet radiation (UV), ionizing irradiation (IOR), high-pressure processing (HPP), ozone treatment, cold plasma (non-thermal plasma), and ultrasound technology) with the overview strategy (which include: mechanisms/principles of action, and the associated merits, and restrictions).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic flow of PEF operation pathway (Source: Mohamed and Eissa [18]; permission to use not required).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The food system under high hydrostatic pressure showing how the latter gets applied from all sides to the food material (Source: Khan et al. [36]; permission to use given by Elsevier Science).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic diagram showing the cavitation and sponge effect of ultrasound technology (Source: Astráin-Redín et al. [66]; permission to use not required).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic diagram of a pulsed light (PL) chamber (Source: Mahendran et al. [73]. Permission to use given by Elsevier Science).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic diagram for set-up of ozone generator highlighting corona discharge instrument: Key: A = Oxygen cylinder; B = Flow rate controller; C = Bubble type flow meter; D = Ozone generator; E = Transformer; F and G = Excess ozone traps (4% KI); H = Rotating vessel (90 rpm); V = Valve; X = High tension electrode (Source: Okpala, [103]; Permission to use not required).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic depiction of three typical electrical discharges for generating the non-thermal plasma with typical sizes indicated and discharge appearance (Source: Scholtz et al. [128]; permission to use given by Elsevier Science).

References

    1. Roobab U., Aadil R.M., Madni G.M., Bekhit A.E.-D. The Impact of Nonthermal Technologies on the Microbiological Quality of Juices: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018;17:437–457. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12336. - DOI - PubMed
    1. La Peña M.M.-D., Welti-Chanes J., Martín-Belloso O. Novel technologies to improve food safety and quality. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019;30:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.10.009. - DOI
    1. Troy D.J., Ojha K.S., Kerry J.P., Tiwari B.K. Sustainable and consumer-friendly emerging technologies for application within the meat industry: An overview. Meat Sci. 2016;120:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernández-Hernández H., Moreno-Vilet L., Villanueva-Rodríguez S. Current status of emerging food processing technologies in Latin America: Novel non-thermal processing. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019;58:102233. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102233. - DOI
    1. Knockaert G., Pulissery S.K., Lemmens L., Van Buggenhout S., Hendrickx M., Van Loey A. Carrot β-Carotene Degradation and Isomerization Kinetics during Thermal Processing in the Presence of Oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:10312–10319. doi: 10.1021/jf3025776. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources