Sensory and Olfactometry Chemometrics as Valuable Tools for Assessing Hops' Aroma Impact on Dry-Hopped Beers: A Study with Wild Portuguese Genotypes
- PMID: 34204222
- PMCID: PMC8234261
- DOI: 10.3390/foods10061397
Sensory and Olfactometry Chemometrics as Valuable Tools for Assessing Hops' Aroma Impact on Dry-Hopped Beers: A Study with Wild Portuguese Genotypes
Abstract
Sensory, olfactometry (using the sums of odour intensities for each class of compounds) and chemometric analyses were used to evaluate Portuguese wild hops' sensory characteristics and the aroma that those hops impart to dry-hopped beer. CATA analysis and agglomerative hierarchical clustering was applied for the sensory characterization of 15 wild hops of Portuguese genotypes, clustering them in two groups: one more sulphurous, floral, and fruity, and another more earthy, resinous, floral, and non-citrus fruits. Two hops representative of each group were selected for the production of four dry-hopped beers using the same base beer style (Munich Helles). Beers were analysed by quantitative descriptive analyses and quantification of hop-derived key volatile compounds. Multivariate statistical treatment of the data was performed. Results indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in fruity, resinous, earthy, floral, and sulphurous attributes of hops, but the dry-hopped beers only have a significant increase (p < 0.05) in fruity and spicy notes when compared with non-dry-hopped Munich-style Helles beer. Hop olfactometry explained the sensory perception that the 11 hops not used for brewing (employed as supplementary observations) are placed into the space of the odour-active compounds profile of the four hops selected for brewing. These 11 hop samples have more spiciness than fruitiness potential.
Keywords: CATA; aroma compounds; beer; certified assessors; multivariate statistical analysis; olfactometry; quantitative descriptive analysis; wild hops.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Schönberger C., Kostelecky T. 125th Anniversary Review: The Role of Hops in Brewing. J. Inst. Brew. 2011;117:259–267. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00471.x. - DOI
-
- Almaguer C., Schoenberger C., Gastl M., Arendt E.K., Becker T. Humulus lupulus—A story that begs to be told. A review. J. Inst. Brew. 2014;120:289–314. doi: 10.1002/jib.160. - DOI
-
- Donaldson B.R., Bamforth C.W., Heymann H. Sensory Descriptive Analysis and Free-Choice Profiling of Thirteen Hop Varieties as Whole Cones and After Dry Hopping of Beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2012;70:176–181. doi: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2012-0710-01. - DOI
-
- Hanke S., Schull F., Seigner E., Lutz A. Development of a Tasting Scheme and a New Systematic Evaluation Program for new German Breeding Lines by example of the New German varieties Callista (CI) and Ariana (AN) Brew. Sci. 2016;69:94–102.
-
- Rocha F. Distribuição e Ecologia do Lúpulo (Humulus lupulus L.) em Portugal. Universidade do Minho; Braga, Portugal: 2005.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
