Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 3;10(11):2482.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10112482.

Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Ahmad Khoshal Khorami  1 , Crystian B Oliveira  2   3 , Christopher G Maher  3   4 , Patrick J E Bindels  1 , Gustavo C Machado  3   4 , Rafael Z Pinto  5 , Bart W Koes  1   6 , Alessandro Chiarotto  1
Affiliations
Review

Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Ahmad Khoshal Khorami et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The management of patients with lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) is of primary importance to healthcare professionals. This study aimed to: identify international clinical practice guidelines on LRP, assess their methodological quality, and summarize their diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. A systematic search was performed (August 2019) in MEDLINE, PEDro, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), International Guideline Library, Guideline central, and Google Scholar. Guidelines presenting recommendations on diagnosis and/or treatment of adult patients with LRP were included. Two independent reviewers selected eligible guidelines, evaluated quality with Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II, and extracted recommendations. Recommendations were classified into 'should do', 'could do', 'do not do', or 'uncertain'; their consistency was labelled as 'consistent', 'common', or 'inconsistent'. Twenty-three guidelines of varying quality (AGREE II overall assessment ranging from 17% to 92%) were included. Consistent recommendations regarding diagnosis are ('should do'): Straight leg raise (SLR) test, crossed SLR test, mapping pain distribution, gait assessment, congruence of signs and symptoms. Routine use of imaging is consistently not recommended. The following therapeutic options are consistently recommended ('should do'): educational care, physical activity, discectomy under specific circumstances (e.g., failure of conservative treatment). Referral to a specialist is recommended when conservative therapy fails or when steppage gait is present. These recommendations provide a clear overview of the management options in patients with LRP.

Keywords: AGREE II; clinical practice guidelines; diagnosis; lumbar radicular pain; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hartvigsen J., Hancock M.J., Kongsted A., Louw Q., Ferreira M.L., Genevay S., Hoy D., Karppinen J., Pransky G., Sieper J., et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391:2356–2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freburger J.K., Holmes G.M., Agans R.P., Jackman A.M., Darter J.D., Wallace A.S., Castel L.D., Kalsbeek W.D., Carey T.S. The Rising Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009;169:251–258. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoy D., March L., Brooks P., Woolf A., Blyth F., Vos T., Buchbinder R. Measuring the global burden of low back pain. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010;24:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Connell N.E., Ward S.P. Low Back Pain: What Have Clinical Guidelines Ever Done for Us? J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018;48:54–57. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0602. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Disease G.B.D., Injury I., Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analy-sis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–1858. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources