Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 22;10(7):783.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070783.

Digital Biosurveillance for Zoonotic Disease Detection in Kenya

Affiliations

Digital Biosurveillance for Zoonotic Disease Detection in Kenya

Ravikiran Keshavamurthy et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Infectious disease surveillance is crucial for early detection and situational awareness of disease outbreaks. Digital biosurveillance monitors large volumes of open-source data to flag potential health threats. This study investigates the potential of digital surveillance in the detection of the top five priority zoonotic diseases in Kenya: Rift Valley fever (RVF), anthrax, rabies, brucellosis, and trypanosomiasis. Open-source disease events reported between August 2016 and October 2020 were collected and key event-specific information was extracted using a newly developed disease event taxonomy. A total of 424 disease reports encompassing 55 unique events belonging to anthrax (43.6%), RVF (34.6%), and rabies (21.8%) were identified. Most events were first reported by news media (78.2%) followed by international health organizations (16.4%). News media reported the events 4.1 (±4.7) days faster than the official reports. There was a positive association between official reporting and RVF events (odds ratio (OR) 195.5, 95% confidence interval (CI); 24.01-4756.43, p < 0.001) and a negative association between official reporting and local media coverage of events (OR 0.03, 95% CI; 0.00-0.17, p = 0.030). This study highlights the usefulness of local news in the detection of potentially neglected zoonotic disease events and the importance of digital biosurveillance in resource-limited settings.

Keywords: Kenya; biosurveillance; digital surveillance; disease taxonomy; open-source information; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Details of disease events identified, their reporting sources, various event-specific epidemiological indicators reported, and the source that first reported them, between August 2016 and October 2020.

References

    1. Murray J., Cohen A.L. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Elsevier Inc.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2016. Infectious Disease Surveillance; pp. 222–229.
    1. Milinovich G.J., Williams G.M., Clements A.C.A., Hu W. Internet-Based Surveillance Systems for Monitoring Emerging Infectious Diseases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14:160–168. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70244-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Shea J.Ç. Digital disease detection: A systematic review of event-based internet biosurveillance systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2017;101:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munyua P., Bitek A., Osoro E., Pieracci E.G., Muema J., Mwatondo A., Kungu M., Nanyingi M., Gharpure R., Njenga K., et al. Prioritization of Zoonotic Diseases in Kenya, 2015. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0161576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161576. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morse S.S. Public Health Surveillance and Infectious Disease Detection. Biosecur. Bioterror. 2012 doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0088. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources