Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 9;10(12):2557.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10122557.

Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

Lucian Mocan. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, and it is responsible for 7.7% of all cancer deaths. Despite advances in the field of oncology, where radiotherapy, neo and adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the outcome, the only treatment with curative intent is represented by surgery as part of a multimodal therapy. Two concepts may be adopted in appropriate cases, neoadjuvant treatment before gastrectomy (G) or primary surgical resection followed by chemotherapy. Such an approach, combined with early detection and better screening, has led to a decrease in the overall incidence of gastric cancer. Unfortunately, malignant tumors of the stomach are often diagnosed in locally advanced or metastatic stages when the median overall survival remains poor. Surgical care in these cases must be provided by a multidisciplinary team in a high-volume center. Important surgical aspects such as optimum resection margins, surgical technique, and number of harvested lymph nodes are important factors for patient outcomes. The standardization of surgical treatment of gastric cancer in accordance with the patient's profile is of decisive importance for a better outcome. This review aims to summarize the current standards in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Keywords: gastric cancer; lymphadenectomy; surgery; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment strategies of gastric cancer according to TNM stage. Stage 0: TisN0M0; stage IA: T1N0M0; stage IB: T2N0M0; stage II: T1N2M0/T2N1M0/T3N0M0; stage IIIA: T3N1M0/T4N0M0; stage IIIB: T3N2M0; stage IV: T3N1-3M0/T1-3N3M0/T1-4N0-3M1 (Tis—the mucosa; T1—submucosa;T2—muscle layer; T3—subserosa; T4—serosa/adjacent structures/N0—(0+)LN; N1—(1–2+)LN; N2—(3–6+)LN; N3—(>7+)LN/M0—no metastasis; M1—distant metastasis or carcinomatosis); LN—lymph nodes; ST—subtotal; T—total; ChT—chemotherapy; ChRxT—chemo-radiotherapy; preop—preoperative; postop—postoperative.

References

    1. Suh Y., Lee J., Woo H., Shin D., Kong S., Lee H., Shin A., Yang H. National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea: Nationwide Treatment Benefit and Cost. Cancer. 2020;126:1929–1939. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32753. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrillo A., Smyth E.C. Multimodality Treatment for Localized Gastric Cancer: State of the Art and New Insights. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2020;32:347–355. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000630. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018. Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song Z., Wu Y., Yang J., Yang D., Fang X. Progress in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer. Tumor Biol. 2017;39:1010428317714626. doi: 10.1177/1010428317714626. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tokunaga M., Sato Y., Nakagawa M., Aburatani T., Matsuyama T., Nakajima Y., Kinugasa Y. Perioperative Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer in Japan: Current and Future Perspectives. Surg. Today. 2020;50:30–37. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01896-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources