Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 30;13(13):3291.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13133291.

Ancillary Diagnostic Investigations in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Affiliations
Review

Ancillary Diagnostic Investigations in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Alex Dipper et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

For a number of patients presenting with an undiagnosed pleural effusion, frailty, medical co-morbidity or personal choice may preclude the use of pleural biopsy, the gold standard investigation for diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). In this review article, we outline the most recent evidence on ancillary diagnostic tests which may be used to support a diagnosis of MPM where histological samples cannot be obtained or where results are non-diagnostic. Immunocytochemical markers, molecular techniques, diagnostic biomarkers and imaging techniques are discussed. No adjunctive test has a sensitivity and specificity profile to support use in isolation; however, correlation of pleural fluid cytology with relevant radiology and supplementary biomarkers can enable an MDT-consensus clinico-radiological-cytological diagnosis to be made where further invasive tests are not possible or not appropriate. Diagnostic challenges surrounding non-epithelioid MPM are recognised, and there is a critical need for reliable and non-invasive investigative tools in this population.

Keywords: biomarkers; malignant pleural mesothelioma; pleural effusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A suggested diagnostic approach where distinction of malignant from benign mesothelial proliferation is unclear on initial fluid cytology. BAP1 loss and p16 deletion support the diagnosis of MPM. MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma; ICC, immunocytochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in-situ hybridization; BAP1, BRCA 1-associated protein.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Woolhouse I., Bishop L., Darlison L., De Fonseka D., Edey A., Edwards J., Faivre-Finn C., Fennell D.A., Holmes S., Kerr K.M., et al. British Thoracic Society Guideline for the investigation and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Thorax. 2018;73:i1–i30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sekido Y. Molecular pathogenesis of malignant mesothelioma. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:1413–1419. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt166. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner J.C., Sleggs C.A., Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1960;17:260–271. doi: 10.1136/oem.17.4.260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bibby A.C., Tsim S., Kanellakis N., Ball H., Talbot D.C., Blyth K.G., Maskell N.A., Psallidas I. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: An update on investigation, diagnosis and treatment. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2016;25:472–486. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0063-2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. LaDou J., Castleman B., Frank A., Gochfeld M., Greenberg M., Huff J., Joshi T.K., Landrigan P.J., Lemen R., Myers J., et al. The Case for a Global Ban on Asbestos. Environ. Heal Perspect. 2010;118:897–901. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002285. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources