Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;108(6):445-450.
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319110. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

Association between ibrutinib treatment and hypertension

Affiliations

Association between ibrutinib treatment and hypertension

Dae Hyun Lee et al. Heart. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor most commonly associated with atrial fibrillation. However, additional cardiotoxicities have been identified, including accelerated hypertension. The incidence and risk factors of new or worsening hypertension following ibrutinib treatment are not as well known.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 144 patients diagnosed with B cell malignancies treated with ibrutinib (n=93) versus conventional chemoimmunotherapy (n=51) and evaluated their effects on blood pressure at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation. Descriptive statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics for each treatment group. Fisher's exact test was used to identify covariates significantly associated with the development of hypertension. Repeated measures analyses were conducted to analyse longitudinal blood pressure changes.

Results: Both treatments had similar prevalence of baseline hypertension at 63.4% and 66.7%, respectively. There were no differences between treatments by age, sex and baseline cardiac comorbidities. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly increased over time with ibrutinib compared with baseline, whereas conventional chemoimmunotherapy was not associated with significant changes in blood pressure. Baseline hypertensive status did not affect the degree of blood pressure change over time. A significant increase in systolic blood pressure (defined as more than 10 mm Hg) was noted for ibrutinib (36.6%) compared with conventional chemoimmunotherapy (7.9%) at 1 month after treatment initiation. Despite being hypertensive at follow-up, 61.2% of patients who were treated with ibrutinib did not receive adequate blood pressure management (increase or addition of blood pressure medications). Within the ibrutinib group, of patients who developed more than 20 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure, only 52.9% had hypertension management changes.

Conclusions: Ibrutinib is associated with the development of hypertension and worsening of blood pressure. Cardiologists and oncologists must be aware of this cardiotoxicity to allow timely management of blood pressure elevations.

Keywords: drug monitoring; health care; hypertension; outcome assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MF is advisor/consultant for Takeda and Abbott and received research grant from Medtronic. JP-I is investigator for Novartis and Ariad; consultant/advisor for Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ariad; and received consulting/speakers bureau fees from Janssen and Pharmacyclics. The rest of the authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in blood pressure over time based on treatment group. (A) Changes in systolic blood pressure over time based on treatment regimen. Ibrutinib treatment causes significant increase in systolic blood pressure over time compared with baseline. (B) Changes in diastolic blood pressure over time based on treatment regimen. In a repeated measure post-hoc Bonferroni test, there was statistically significant increase in blood pressure at 1 month and at 2–6 months summary data when compared with baseline (p<0.001) in the ibrutinib group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plot for changes in blood pressure from baseline to 1 month by treatment and baseline hypertension status. Systolic (A) and diastolic (B) blood pressure changes from baseline and 1 month were not different between hypertension (red bar) and normotension (blue bar) in both ibrutinib and conventional chemoimmunotherapy groups. Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly different overall for ibrutinib versus conventional chemoimmunotherapy (p<0.001) in the ibrutinib group. Δ, change in blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HTN, hypertension; NS, not statistically significant; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

References

    1. Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2425–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O’Brien S, et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2014;371:213–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dreyling M, Jurczak W, Jerkeman M, et al. Ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2016;387:770–8. - PubMed
    1. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010;376:1164–74. - PubMed
    1. Knauf WU, Lissichkov T, Aldaoud A, et al. Phase III randomized study of bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4378–84. - PubMed