Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 15:8:680539.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.680539. eCollection 2021.

Lineage Differentiation Markers as a Proxy for Embryo Viability in Farm Ungulates

Affiliations

Lineage Differentiation Markers as a Proxy for Embryo Viability in Farm Ungulates

Alba Pérez-Gómez et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Embryonic losses constitute a major burden for reproductive efficiency of farm animals. Pregnancy losses in ungulate species, which include cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, majorly occur during the second week of gestation, when the embryo experiences a series of cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration processes encompassed under the term conceptus elongation. Conceptus elongation takes place following blastocyst hatching and involves a massive proliferation of the extraembryonic membranes trophoblast and hypoblast, and the formation of flat embryonic disc derived from the epiblast, which ultimately gastrulates generating the three germ layers. This process occurs prior to implantation and it is exclusive from ungulates, as embryos from other mammalian species such as rodents or humans implant right after hatching. The critical differences in embryo development between ungulates and mice, the most studied mammalian model, have precluded the identification of the genes governing lineage differentiation in livestock species. Furthermore, conceptus elongation has not been recapitulated in vitro, hindering the study of these cellular events. Luckily, recent advances on transcriptomics, genome modification and post-hatching in vitro culture are shedding light into this largely unknown developmental window, uncovering possible molecular markers to determine embryo quality. In this review, we summarize the events occurring during ungulate pre-implantation development, highlighting recent findings which reveal that several dogmas in Developmental Biology established by knock-out murine models do not hold true for other mammals, including humans and farm animals. The developmental failures associated to in vitro produced embryos in farm animals are also discussed together with Developmental Biology tools to assess embryo quality, including molecular markers to assess proper lineage commitment and a post-hatching in vitro culture system able to directly determine developmental potential circumventing the need of experimental animals.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies; conceptus elongation; developmental biology; embryo quality; embryo transfer; lineage markers; post-hatching embryo culture; viability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparative developmental timeline between mice, humans, and farm ungulates. Different cell lineages are indicated. Embryo development in humans and farm ungulates is delayed compared to mice. Implantation takes place after blastocyst hatching in mice and humans, while in farm ungulates it occurs following conceptus elongation. Mouse epiblast develops in a cup shape after the blastocyst stage, while in humans and farm ungulates it forms a flat embryonic disc. E, embryonic day; ICM, inner cell mass; EPI, epiblast; HYPO, hypoblast; TE, trophectoderm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of lineage-specific markers in ovine embryos at different developmental stages. Fluorescence images of embryos stained for SOX2 (epiblast); SOX17/GATA6/FOXA2 (hypoblast/endoderm); CDX2/GATA3 (trophectoderm); T (mesoderm). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (merge). (a,b) D9 Hatched blastocysts; (c,d): D11 Spherical embryos; (e) D13 Tubular embryo; (f) D13 ED without Rauber's layer; (g) gastrulating ED; (h) section of a gastrulating ED. Scale bars = 50 μm for (a,b,f,h); 100 μm for (c,d,g); 500 μm for panel (e).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lineage-specific markers expressed at different developmental stages in farm ungulate embryos. ED, embryonic disc; ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dunne LD, Diskin MG, Sreenan JM. Embryo and foetal loss in beef heifers between day 14 of gestation and full term. Anim Reprod Sci. (2000) 58:39–44. 10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00088-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett GL, Leymaster KA. Integration of ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity into a model of litter size in swine. J Anim Sci. (1989) 67:1230–41. 10.2527/jas1989.6751230x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maddox-Hyttel P, Alexopoulos NI, Vajta G, Lewis I, Rogers P, Cann L, et al. . Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterization of the initial post-hatching development of bovine embryos. Reproduction. (2003) 125:607–23. 10.1530/reprod/125.4.607 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg DK, van Leeuwen J, Beaumont S, Berg M, Pfeffer PL. Embryo loss in cattle between Days 7 and 16 of pregnancy. Theriogenology. (2010) 73:250–60. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.09.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diskin MG, Morris DG. Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle and other ruminants. Reprod Domest Anim. (2008) 43(Suppl 2):260–7. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01171.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources