Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 15:8:685114.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.685114. eCollection 2021.

Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses

Affiliations

Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses

Shollie M Falkenberg et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Antigenic differences between bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine strains and field isolates can lead to reduced vaccine efficacy. Historically, antigenic differences among BVDV strains were evaluated using techniques based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity. The most common method for antigenic comparison among BVDV isolates is determination of virus neutralization titer (VNT). BVDV antigenic comparisons using VNT only account for the humoral component of the adaptive immune response, and not cell mediated immunity (CMI) giving an incomplete picture of protective responses. Currently, little data is available regarding potential antigenic differences between BVDV vaccine strains and field isolates as measured by CMI responses. The goal of the current paper is to evaluate two groups of cattle that differed in the frequency they were vaccinated, to determine if similar trends in CMI responses exist within each respective group when stimulated with antigenically different BVDV strains. Data from the current study demonstrated variability in the CMI response is associated with the viral strain used for stimulation. Variability in IFN-γ mRNA expression was most pronounced in the CD4+ population, this was observed between the viruses within each respective BVDV subgenotype in the Group 1 calves. The increase in frequency of CD25+ cells and IFN-γ mRNA expression in the CD8+ and CD335+ populations were not as variable between BVDV strains used for stimulation in the Group 1 calves. Additionally, an inverse relationship between VNT and IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed, as the lowest VNT and highest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed and vice versa, the highest VNT and lowest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed. A similar trend regardless of vaccination status was observed between the two groups of calves, as the BVDV-1b strain had lower IFN-γ mRNA expression. Collectively, data from the current study and previous data support, conferring protection against BVDV as a method for control of BVDV in cattle populations is still a complex issue and requires a multifactorial approach to understand factors associated with vaccine efficacy or conversely vaccine failure. Although, there does appear to be an antigenic component associated with CMI responses as well as with humoral responses as determined by VNT.

Keywords: antigenic diversity; antigenicity; bovine viral diarrhea virus; cell mediated response; virus neutralizing titer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JFR was employed by company Ridpath Consulting, LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent positive cells for each respective PBMC subset (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+, (C) CD335+ for IFN-γ mRNA expression in Group 1 vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves at ~10–11 months post-initial vaccination and stimulated with 12 different BVDV strains (4 BVDV-1a, 4 BVDV-1b, and 4 BVDV-2a).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent positive cells for each respective PBMC subset (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+, (C) CD335+ for IFN-γ mRNA expression in Group 1 vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves at ~10–11 months post-initial vaccination and stimulated with three different BVDV strains (PI407 BVDV-1a, Nebraska BVDV-1b, and PI28 BVDV-2a).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percent positive cells for each respective PBMC subset (A) CD4+, (B) CD8+, (C) CD335+ for IFN-γ mRNA expression in Group 2 vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves at ~12 weeks post-initial vaccination and stimulated with three different BVDV strains (PI407 BVDV-1a, Nebraska BVDV-1b, and PI28 BVDV-2a).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evans CA, Pinior B, Larska M, Graham D, Schweizer M, Guidarini C, et al. . Global knowledge gaps in the prevention and control of bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) virus. Transbound Emerg Dis. (2019) 66:640–52. 10.1111/tbed.13068 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scharnböck B, Roch F-F, Richter V, Funke C, Firth CL, Obritzhauser W, et al. . A meta-analysis of bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) prevalences in the global cattle population. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:14420. 10.1038/s41598-018-32831-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ridpath JF. Immunology of BVDV vaccines. Biologicals. (2013) 41:14–9. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2012.07.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindberg A, Houe H. Characteristics in the epidemiology of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) of relevance to control. Prev Vet Med. (2005) 72:55–73. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.07.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deregt D. Introduction and history. In: Ridpath J, Goyal S, editors. Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus: Diagnosis, Management, and Control. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing; (2005). p. 3–33.