Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;284(1):56-73.
doi: 10.1111/jmi.13041. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy

Glyn Nelson  1 Ulrike Boehm  2 Steve Bagley  3 Peter Bajcsy  4 Johanna Bischof  5 Claire M Brown  6 Aurélien Dauphin  7 Ian M Dobbie  8 John E Eriksson  9 Orestis Faklaris  10 Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez  11 Alexia Ferrand  12 Laurent Gelman  13 Ali Gheisari  14 Hella Hartmann  14 Christian Kukat  15 Alex Laude  1 Miso Mitkovski  16 Sebastian Munck  17 Alison J North  18 Tobias M Rasse  19 Ute Resch-Genger  20 Lucas C Schuetz  21 Arne Seitz  22 Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia  23 Jason R Swedlow  24 Ioannis Alexopoulos  25 Karin Aumayr  26 Sergiy Avilov  27 Gert-Jan Bakker  28 Rodrigo R Bammann  29 Andrea Bassi  30 Hannes Beckert  31 Sebastian Beer  32 Yury Belyaev  33 Jakob Bierwagen  34 Konstantin A Birngruber  35 Manel Bosch  36 Juergen Breitlow  37 Lisa A Cameron  38 Joe Chalfoun  4 James J Chambers  39 Chieh-Li Chen  40 Eduardo Conde-Sousa  41   42 Alexander D Corbett  43 Fabrice P Cordelieres  44 Elaine Del Nery  45 Ralf Dietzel  46 Frank Eismann  47 Elnaz Fazeli  48 Andreas Felscher  49 Hans Fried  50 Nathalie Gaudreault  51 Wah Ing Goh  52 Thomas Guilbert  53 Roland Hadleigh  29 Peter Hemmerich  54 Gerhard A Holst  55 Michelle S Itano  56 Claudia B Jaffe  57 Helena K Jambor  58 Stuart C Jarvis  59 Antje Keppler  60 David Kirchenbuechler  61 Marcel Kirchner  15 Norio Kobayashi  62 Gabriel Krens  63 Susanne Kunis  64 Judith Lacoste  65 Marco Marcello  66 Gabriel G Martins  67 Daniel J Metcalf  29 Claire A Mitchell  68 Joshua Moore  24 Tobias Mueller  69 Michael S Nelson  70 Stephen Ogg  71 Shuichi Onami  72 Alexandra L Palmer  73 Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux  74 Jaime A Pimentel  75 Laure Plantard  13 Santosh Podder  76 Elton Rexhepaj  77 Arnaud Royon  78 Markku A Saari  79 Damien Schapman  80 Vincent Schoonderwoert  81 Britta Schroth-Diez  82 Stanley Schwartz  83 Michael Shaw  84 Martin Spitaler  85 Martin T Stoeckl  86 Damir Sudar  87 Jeremie Teillon  88 Stefan Terjung  21 Roland Thuenauer  89 Christian D Wilms  29 Graham D Wright  52 Roland Nitschke  90
Affiliations

QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy

Glyn Nelson et al. J Microsc. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

A modern day light microscope has evolved from a tool devoted to making primarily empirical observations to what is now a sophisticated , quantitative device that is an integral part of both physical and life science research. Nowadays, microscopes are found in nearly every experimental laboratory. However, despite their prevalent use in capturing and quantifying scientific phenomena, neither a thorough understanding of the principles underlying quantitative imaging techniques nor appropriate knowledge of how to calibrate, operate and maintain microscopes can be taken for granted. This is clearly demonstrated by the well-documented and widespread difficulties that are routinely encountered in evaluating acquired data and reproducing scientific experiments. Indeed, studies have shown that more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to repeat another scientist's experiments, while more than half have even failed to reproduce their own experiments. One factor behind the reproducibility crisis of experiments published in scientific journals is the frequent underreporting of imaging methods caused by a lack of awareness and/or a lack of knowledge of the applied technique. Whereas quality control procedures for some methods used in biomedical research, such as genomics (e.g. DNA sequencing, RNA-seq) or cytometry, have been introduced (e.g. ENCODE), this issue has not been tackled for optical microscopy instrumentation and images. Although many calibration standards and protocols have been published, there is a lack of awareness and agreement on common standards and guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility. In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for instruments and images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper (1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; (2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers and observers of such; (3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative and (4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.

Keywords: confocal; light microscopy; metadata; quality assessment; quality control; reproducibility; widefield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING INTERESTS

R.R.B., R.H., D.J.M., C.D.W., S.B., J.B., K.A.B., J.B., R.D., F.E., A.F., W.I.G., G.A.H., C.B.J., S.C.J., J.L., E.R., A.R., V. S., S.S. and D.S. have a financial interest as employees of companies producing, selling or distributing light microscopes or products related or used with light microscopy equipment. A.D.C. has a financial interest in PSFcheck and PyCalibrate.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Acquiring imaging data that is both quantifiable and reproducible involves a myriad of factors, few of which are acknowledged or accurately recorded Note: Intimate knowledge of the composition and performance of a system is essential for reproducibility. However, performance measurements may be tricky, and require specific protocols, tools, samples, training and data analysis methods. In order to help microscope users to assess and judge the performance of their systems properly, the community must agree on and publish guidelines and benchmarks.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Frequency and type of tests performed in core facilities Note: Prior to a session on QC organized during the Microscopy Facility Day at the 2019 ELMI meeting, light microscopy core facility representatives around the globe were asked to complete a survey about the type and the frequency of tests performed in their facility. The link to the survey was opened in June 2019, 2 weeks before the meeting, and sent to all registered participants. It was also advertized multiple times on various international microscopy forums. Reminders were also sent to participants after the meeting and responses were subsequently collected until February 2020. The histograms in panels (A) and (B) summarize the responses from almost 200 facilities in a simplified manner. Panel (A) displays how often different quality checks are performed; the x-axis represents in percentage the respective frequency categories, namely, regularly, on demand and never. Panel (B) highlights which tools are used for performance evaluation of light microscopes; the x-axis represents the percentage of respondents using the indicated QC tool.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Summary of current QUAREP-LiMi participants according to their origin and affiliation with the QUAREP-LiMi logo (updated: 13 May 2021)

References

    1. Baker M (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533, 452–454. - PubMed
    1. Marqués G, Pengo T, & Sanders M (2020). Science Forum: Imaging methods are vastly underreported in biomedical research. eLIFE, 9, e55133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheen MR, Fields JL, Northan B, Lacoste J, Ang L-H, Fiering S, & Biology RPC (2019). Replication Study: Biomechanical remodeling of the microenvironment by stromal caveolin-1 favors tumor invasion and metastasis. eLife, 8, e45120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ENCODE: Encyclopedia of DNA Elements: Data Standards Pipeline. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.encodeproject.org/data-standards/
    1. Better research through metrology. (2018) Nature Methods, 15(6), 395–395. 10.1038/s41592-018-0035-x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types