Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 2;11(1):13770.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92774-z.

The prognostic relevance of HER2-positivity gain in metastatic breast cancer in the ChangeHER trial

Affiliations

The prognostic relevance of HER2-positivity gain in metastatic breast cancer in the ChangeHER trial

Laura Pizzuti et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In metastatic breast cancer (mBC), the change of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between primary and metastatic lesions is widely recognized, however clinical implications are unknown. Our study address the question if relevant differences exist between subjects who preserve the HER2 status and those who gain the HER2 positivity when relapsed. Data of patients affected by HER2-positive mBC, treated with pertuzumab and/or trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in a real-world setting at 45 Italian cancer centers were retrospectively collected and analyzed. From 2003 to 2017, 491 HER2-positive mBC patients were included. Of these, 102 (20.7%) had been initially diagnosed as HER2-negative early BC. Estrogen and/or progesterone receptor were more expressed in patients with HER2-discordance compared to patients with HER2-concordant status (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.006, respectively). HER2-discordant tumors were characterized also by a lower rate of brain metastases (p = 0.01) and a longer disease free interval (p < 0.0001). Median overall survival was longer, although not statistically significant, in the subgroup of patients with HER2-discordant cancer with respect to patients with HER2-concordant status (140 vs 78 months, p = 0.07). Our findings suggest that patients with HER2-positive mBC with discordant HER2 status in early BC may have different clinical, biological and prognostic behavior compared to HER2-concordant patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MB, MM, EK, MMS, RB, CF, EC, DG, AC, VA, CZ, GT, DS, DM, GP, ST, AB, NT, AG, MRV, RM, MAF, NDO, EV, DC, GS, IM, MP, FG, VL, CG, AR, PDM, MR, AV, Let Per, AdB, TD, IS, GS and GC declare no conflicts of interest. LP received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis; speaker fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili. TG received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis; speaker fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili, Lilly. CN received travel grants/personal fees from Pfizer, Eisai, Novartis, Merck Sharp &Dohme, AstraZeneca. EB is supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research AIRC-IG 20583; he was supported by the International Association for Lung Cancer (IASLC), the LILT (Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro I Tumori) and Fondazione Cariverona; he received speakers’ and travels’ fee from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Pfizer, Helsinn, Eli-Lilly, BMS, Novartis and Roche; consultant’s fee from Roche, Pfizer; institutional research grants from Astra-Zeneca, Roche. LM received advisory board from Roche. AM received travel grants from Eisai, Celgene, Novartis Ipsen; personal fees, advisory boards from EISAI, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Teva, Pfizer, Celgene. MC received personal fees, advisory boards from Pierre Fabre, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, Eisai, Novartis, Lilly. NLV received personal fees from Eisai and Novartis; research funding from Eisai, travel grants from Pfizer, Roche, Gentili; consulting role from Celldex. PM has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, and Incyte. IP received personal fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Italfarmaco, Gentili, Pierre Fabre. OG received personal fees from Celgene, Novartis, Eisai; research funding from Eisai, consulting activities with Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Amgen. RDM declares to be a scientific advisory board member at ExosomicsSpA (Siena IT), Hibercell Inc. (New York, NY), Kiromic Inc. (Houston, TX) and at Exiris Inc. (Rome, IT). ADL received consulting fees from Novartis and Roche. PV received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis; speaker fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histopathology features of a patient who switch the HER2 status from negative early breast cancer to positive in metastatic setting. In (a), at breast cancer diagnosis, HER2-assessment resulted as “Membrane staining that is incomplete and barely perceptible and within ≤ 10% of tumor cells. IHC: 0 negative”. At relapse (b), soft tissues from the left parasternal region were biopsied. HER2 expression resulted moderate, completed in > 10% of tumor cells. IHC: 2 + . The FISH resulted into gene amplification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histopathology example of a patient who maintained the HER2 status both in early and metastatic biopsy. At breast cancer diagnosis (a) the pathologists’ report called for “Membrane staining that is complete, intense and in ˃ 10% of tumor cells. IHC: 3 + .” At relapse (b), a cutaneous lesion in the ipsilateral breast was biopsied and the pathologists’ report exactly reproduced the prior one.

References

    1. Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet. 2011;378:1812–1823. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61539-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Poznak C, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on systemic therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:2695–2704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1459. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aurilio G, et al. A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases. Eur. J. Cancer. 2014;50:277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holdaway IM, Bowditch JV. Variation in receptor status between primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 1983;52:479–485. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830801)52:3<479::AID-CNCR2820520317>3.0.CO;2-O. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karlsson E, Appelgren J, Solterbeck A, Bergenheim M, Alvariza V, Bergh J. Breast cancer during follow-up and progression—a population based cohort on new cancers and changed biology. Eur. J. Cancer. 2014;50:2916–2924. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.014. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources