Defining risk factors for adding-on in Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves
- PMID: 34216354
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00382-8
Defining risk factors for adding-on in Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves
Abstract
Purpose: To identify curve/correction characteristics associated with adding-on at 2 years after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in Lenke 1/2 AR curves.
Methods: A prospective multicenter registry was queried to identify patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Lenke 1/2 AR curves, who underwent PSF with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient characteristics as well as pre- and post- operative radiographic variables were evaluated using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to determine which factors contribute to adding-on.
Results: 253 patients treated with PSF were assessed for adding-on, of which 50 met our adding-on criteria. Univariate analysis revealed adding-on was associated several factors including: post-operative thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude (p > 0.001), first erect (FE) end instrumented vertebra (EIV) angulation (p = 0.009) and EIV translation (p = 0.001), younger age (p = 0.027), Risser stage (p = 0.024), and a more proximal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) (p < 0.001). Multivariate CART analysis showed the chance of adding-on was more than 2 times greater (42 vs 16%) when the chosen LIV was translated more than 2.7 cm from the CSVL. When the LIV was within 2.7 cm, the post-op risk of adding-on was increased when the LIV was not perfectly leveled (> 0.5°).
Conclusion: In Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves, pre-operative LIV translation appears to be an independent risk factor for adding-on; and in those with < 2.7 cm of LIV translation, FE LIV angulation also seems to increase the risk of adding-on. These factors are relevant in determining appropriate LIV selection and aid in identifying patients at risk for developing adding-on.
Keywords: Adding-on; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Central sacral vertical line; Lowest instrumented vertebra; Posterior spinal fusion.
© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- Xu W, Chen C, Li Y et al (2017) Distal adding-on phenomenon in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with thoracolumbar vertebra fusion: a case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(38):e8099. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008099 - DOI
-
- Yang C, Li Y, Yang M et al (2016) Adding-on phenomenon after surgery in Lenke type 1, 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is it predictable? Spine 41(8):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001303 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Qin X, Sun W, Xu L, Liu Z, Qiu Y, Zhu Z (2016) Selecting the last “substantially” touching vertebra as lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 1A curve: radiographic outcomes with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Spine 41(12):E742-750. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001374 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cao K, Watanabe K, Kawakami N et al (2014) Selection of lower instrumented vertebra in treating Lenke type 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 39(4):E253-261. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000126 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N et al (2013) Postoperative distal adding-on and related factors in Lenke type 1A curve. Spine 38(9):737–744. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318279b666 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous