Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 9;74(7):1199-1207.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab610.

Relapse of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale Malaria With and Without Primaquine Treatment in a Nonendemic Area

Affiliations

Relapse of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale Malaria With and Without Primaquine Treatment in a Nonendemic Area

Andreas Wångdahl et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of primaquine in preventing Plasmodium vivax relapses from dormant stages is well established. For Plasmodium ovale, the relapse characteristics and the use of primaquine is not as well studied. We set to evaluate the relapsing properties of these 2 species, in relation to primaquine use among imported malaria cases in a nonendemic setting.

Methods: We performed a nationwide retrospective study of malaria diagnosed in Sweden 1995-2019, by reviewing medical records of 3254 cases. All episodes of P. vivax (n = 972) and P. ovale (n = 251) were selected for analysis.

Results: First time relapses were reported in 80/857 (9.3%) P. vivax and 9/220 (4.1%) P. ovale episodes, respectively (P < .01). Without primaquine, the risk for relapse was higher in P. vivax, 20/60 (33.3%), compared to 3/30 (10.0%) in P. ovale (hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-12.0). In P. vivax, patients prescribed primaquine had a reduced risk of relapse compared to episodes without relapse preventing treatment, 7.1% vs 33.3% (HR 0.2, 95% CI .1-.3). In P. ovale, the effect of primaquine on the risk of relapse did not reach statistical significance, with relapses seen in 2.8% of the episodes compared to 10.0% in patients not receiving relapse preventing treatment (HR 0.3, 95% CI .1-1.1).

Conclusions: The risk of relapse was considerably lower in P. ovale than in P. vivax infections indicating different relapsing features between the two species. Primaquine was effective in preventing P. vivax relapse. In P. ovale, relapse episodes were few, and the supportive evidence for primaquine remains limited.

Keywords: P. ovale; P. vivax; malaria; primaquine; relapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Chart of study population.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing the occurrence of relapse in all first diagnosed P. vivax (blue solid line) and P. ovale (red dashed line).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Plot visualizing the smoothed hazard function for relapse in P. vivax (left) and P. ovale (right) in episodes with (red dashed line) and without primaquine prescription (blue solid line). Long-term chloroquine is not included in the graph.

References

    1. WHO. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020.
    1. Yman V, Wandell G, Mutemi DD, et al. . Persistent transmission of Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale species in an area of declining Plasmodium falciparum transmission in eastern Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019; 13:e0007414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Battle KE, Lucas TCD, Nguyen M, et al. . Mapping the global endemicity and clinical burden of Plasmodium vivax, 2000–17: a spatial and temporal modelling study. Lancet 2019; 394:332–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howes RE, Battle KE, Mendis KN, et al. . Global epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016; 95:15–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groger M, Fischer HS, Veletzky L, Lalremruata A, Ramharter M. A systematic review of the clinical presentation, treatment and relapse characteristics of human Plasmodium ovale malaria. Malar J 2017; 16:112. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types