Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 5;17(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00113-x.

The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks

Eugen Octav Popa  1 , Mireille van Hilten  2 , Elsje Oosterkamp  2 , Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt  2
Affiliations

The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks

Eugen Octav Popa et al. Life Sci Soc Policy. .

Abstract

Anticipating the ethical impact of emerging technologies is an essential part of responsible innovation. One such emergent technology is the digital twin which we define here as a living replica of a physical system (human or non-human). A digital twin combines various emerging technologies such as AI, Internet of Things, big data and robotics, each component bringing its own socio-ethical issues to the resulting artefacts. The question thus arises which of these socio-ethical themes surface in the process and how they are perceived by stakeholders in the field. In this report we present the results of a qualitative study into the socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks of using digital twins in healthcare. Employing insights from ethics of technology and the Quadruple Helix theory of innovation, we conducted desk research of white literature and 23 interviews with representatives from the four helixes: industry, research, policy and civil society. The ethical scan revealed several important areas where the digital twin can produce socio-ethical value (e.g., prevention and treatment of disease, cost reduction, patient autonomy and freedom, equal treatment) but also several important areas of socio-ethical risks (e.g., privacy and property of data, disruption of existing societal structures, inequality and injustice). We conclude with a reflection on the employed analytical tool and suggestions for further research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of identified socio-ethical issues
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bagaria N, Laamarti F, Badawi HF, Albraikan A, Martinez Velazquez RA, el Saddik A. Health 4.0: Digital twins for health and well-being’. In: El Saddik A, Hossain M, Kantarci B, editors. Connected Health in Smart Cities. Cham: Springer Nature; 2020.
    1. Björnsson B, et al. Digital twins to personalize medicine. Genome Medicine. 2020;12(1):1–4. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0701-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brey P. Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics. 2012;6(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7. - DOI
    1. Brey P. Ethics of emerging technology. In: Hansson SO, editor. The ethics of technology: methods and approaches. London: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2017. pp. 175–193.
    1. Bruynseels K. When nature goes digital: routes for responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 2020;7(3):342–360. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2020.1771144. - DOI