Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 7:2021:6665267.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6665267. eCollection 2021.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Noninvasive Liver Reserve and Fibrosis (PALBI and FIB-4) Model to Predict Posthepatectomy Liver Failure Grade B-C in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Noninvasive Liver Reserve and Fibrosis (PALBI and FIB-4) Model to Predict Posthepatectomy Liver Failure Grade B-C in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Wenhui Zhong et al. J Oncol. .

Abstract

Hepatectomy is currently one of the most effective treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, postoperative liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication and the leading cause of mortality in patients with HCC after hepatectomy. This study attempted to develop a novel nomogram based on noninvasive liver reserve and fibrosis models, platelet-albumin-bilirubin grade (PALBI) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), able to predict PHLF grade B-C. This was a single-centre retrospective study of 574 patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy between 2014 and 2018. The independent risk factors of PHLF were screened using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using the training set, and the nomogram was developed and visualised. The utility of the model was evaluated in a validation set using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A total of 574 HCC patients were included (383 in the training set and 191 for the validation set) and included PHLF grade B-C complications of 14.8, 15.4, and 13.6%, respectively. Overall, cirrhosis (P < 0.026, OR = 2.296, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1.02-4.786), major hepatectomy (P=0.031, OR = 2.211, 95% CI 1.077-4.542), ascites (P=0.014, OR = 3.588, 95% 1.299-9.913), intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001, OR = 4.683, 95% CI 2.281-9.616), PALBI score >-2.53 (, OR = 3.609, 95% CI 1.486-8.764), and FIB-4 score ≥1.45 (P < 0.001, OR = 5.267, 95% CI 2.077-13.351) were identified as independent risk factors associated with PHLF grade B-C in the training set. The areas under the ROC curves for the nomogram model in predicting PHLF grade B-C were significant for both the training and validation sets (0.832 vs 0.803). The proposed nomogram predicted PHLF grade B-C among patients with HCC with a better prognostic accuracy than other currently available fibrosis and noninvasive liver reserve models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The nomogram model for predicting PHLF grade B-C in patients with HCC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve for the constructed nomogram model for predicting PHLF grade B-C: (a) training set; (d) validation set. The optimal cut-off value (highest Youden index) for the nomogram model for predicting PHLF grade B-C: (b) training set; (e) validation set. Calibration plots show the relationship between the predicted probabilities based on the nomogram and actual values: (c) training set; (f) validation set.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic curves of nomogram models and Child–Pugh, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), platelet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI) score, and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) for predicting PHLF grade B-C: (a) training set; (b) validation set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Uttley L., Indave B. I., Hyde C., White V., Lokuhetty D., Cree I. Invited commentary- WHO classification of tumours: how should tumors be classified? expert consensus, systematic reviews or both? International Journal of Cancer. 2020;146(12):3516–3521. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32975. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vibert E., Schwartz M., Olthoff K. M. Advances in resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology. 2020;72(2):262–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim Y. S., Shin S. W. Hepatocellular carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;381(1):p. e2. - PubMed
    1. Prodeau M., Drumez E., Duhamel A., et al. An ordinal model to predict the risk of symptomatic liver failure in patients with cirrhosis undergoing hepatectomy. Journal of Hepatology. 2019;71(5):920–929. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melloul E., Hübner M., Scott M., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World Journal of Surgery. 2016;40(10):2425–2440. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources