Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;12(3):336-341.
doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.3.336.

CavatermTM plus treatment in high - risk surgical patients

Affiliations

CavatermTM plus treatment in high - risk surgical patients

Zinatossadat Bouzari et al. Caspian J Intern Med. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thermal balloon ablation in women with high anesthetic and surgical risk compared to invulnerable women according to the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status stratification.

Methods: This report was based on a retrospective cohort study of women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) who were eligible for treatment with CavatermTM plus during 2012-2017. Women were classified as high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) cohorts based on ASA physical status stratification. The primary outcome includes amenorrhea in the twelfth months after the treatment. Risk adjustments were performed using regression models.

Results: This research study consisted of 63 women with mean age 44.42±5.48. Mean of body mass index (BMI) in the HR cohort was higher than the LR cohort (31.48±6.22 vs 26.83± 3.51, P=0.005) and results were also similar considering the uterine length (mm) between HR and LR women (58.27±35.70 vs 30.92± 35.30, P=0.01). The primary outcome of treatment after a one-year follow-up in the two groups (HR and LR) was 31 (93.9%) and 15 (78.9%), respectively. After adjusting for known confounders including age, uterine length, parity, dysmenorrheal, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.14- 2.5; P= 0.60).

Conclusion: For women with high anesthetic and surgical risks derived from serious underlying co morbidities, endometrial ablation can provide a minimally invasive, safe, and effective therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Keywords: Amenorrhea; Anesthesia; Endometrial ablation; Menorrhagia; Obese women; Recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Lethaby A, Penninx J, Hickey M, Garry R, Marjoribanks J. Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD001501. - PubMed
    1. Bouzari Z, Yazdani S, RAD M, Bijani A. Is thermal balloon ablation in women with previous cesarean delivery successful? Turk J Med Sci. 2018;48:266–70. - PubMed
    1. El-Nashar SA, Hopkins MR, Creedon DJ, Cliby WA, Famuyide AO. Efficacy of bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation vs thermal balloon ablation for management of menorrhagia: a population-based cohort. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:692–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penezic L, Riley K, Harkins G. Long-term patient satisfaction with thermal balloon ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding. JSLS: J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surg. 2014;18:e2014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouzari Z, Yazdani S, Azimi S, Delavar MA. Thermal balloon endothermic ablation in treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Med Arch. 2014;68:411–3. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources