CavatermTM plus treatment in high - risk surgical patients
- PMID: 34221285
- PMCID: PMC8223040
- DOI: 10.22088/cjim.12.3.336
CavatermTM plus treatment in high - risk surgical patients
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thermal balloon ablation in women with high anesthetic and surgical risk compared to invulnerable women according to the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status stratification.
Methods: This report was based on a retrospective cohort study of women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) who were eligible for treatment with CavatermTM plus during 2012-2017. Women were classified as high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) cohorts based on ASA physical status stratification. The primary outcome includes amenorrhea in the twelfth months after the treatment. Risk adjustments were performed using regression models.
Results: This research study consisted of 63 women with mean age 44.42±5.48. Mean of body mass index (BMI) in the HR cohort was higher than the LR cohort (31.48±6.22 vs 26.83± 3.51, P=0.005) and results were also similar considering the uterine length (mm) between HR and LR women (58.27±35.70 vs 30.92± 35.30, P=0.01). The primary outcome of treatment after a one-year follow-up in the two groups (HR and LR) was 31 (93.9%) and 15 (78.9%), respectively. After adjusting for known confounders including age, uterine length, parity, dysmenorrheal, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.14- 2.5; P= 0.60).
Conclusion: For women with high anesthetic and surgical risks derived from serious underlying co morbidities, endometrial ablation can provide a minimally invasive, safe, and effective therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Keywords: Amenorrhea; Anesthesia; Endometrial ablation; Menorrhagia; Obese women; Recovery.
Copyright © 2020, Babol University of Medical Sciences.
Similar articles
-
Nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in high-risk surgical patients: a cohort study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.005. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23870238
-
A randomised controlled trial comparing the Cavaterm endometrial ablation system with the Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.BJOG. 2003 Apr;110(4):350-7. BJOG. 2003. PMID: 12699795 Clinical Trial.
-
Thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Med Arch. 2014 Dec;68(6):411-3. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.411-413. Epub 2014 Dec 16. Med Arch. 2014. PMID: 25648851 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 29;8(8):CD000329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000329.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 23;2:CD000329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000329.pub4. PMID: 31463964 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):302-311. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz051. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 31990359
References
-
- Lethaby A, Penninx J, Hickey M, Garry R, Marjoribanks J. Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD001501. - PubMed
-
- Bouzari Z, Yazdani S, RAD M, Bijani A. Is thermal balloon ablation in women with previous cesarean delivery successful? Turk J Med Sci. 2018;48:266–70. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources