Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 20;14(7):1747-1751.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa189. eCollection 2021 Jul.

The arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification

Affiliations

The arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification

Peter Baláž et al. Clin Kidney J. .

Abstract

Background: Key anatomical factors mean that individuals needing arteriovenous access are unique and have different possibilities for fistula creation. The aim of this article is to describe a new classification system for all patients needing haemodialysis vascular access in the upper extremity with the purpose to simplify sharing the information about suitability for surgical access creation depending on vascular anatomy.

Methods: According to the patient's vascular anatomy in right and left superior extremities, patients were separated into three arteriovenous access stages (AVAS). The AVAS was validated by three blinded observers using a sample of 70 upper limb arteriovenous maps that were performed using ultrasound on patients referred for vascular access assessment. A sample size calculation was performed and calculated that for three observers, a minimum of 67 maps were required to confirm significant agreement at a Kappa value of 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.99).

Results: The Kappa value for inter-rater reliability using Fleiss' Kappa coefficient was 0.94 and all patients fitted into the AVAS classification system.

Conclusion: The AVAS classification system is a simplified way to share information about vascular access options based on a patient's vascular anatomy with high inter-rater reliability.

Keywords: arteriovenous fistula; arteriovenous graft; classification; haemodialysis; vascular access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
AVAS 1 indicates the possibility of autogenous AVA in different parts of the upper extremity. A negative Allen’s test is demonstration of a complete palmar arch and intact collateral blood flow to the hand.
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
AVAS 2 is reserved for patients in whom conventional autogenous AVA is not possible and the only option is an arteriovenous graft. A negative Allen’s test is demonstration of a complete palmar arch and intact collateral blood flow to the hand.
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 3:
AVAS 3 is reserved for patients without the possibility for conventionally created autogenous or prosthetic options for access creation due to insufficient venous, arterial system or its combination. A negative Allen’s test is demonstration of a complete palmar arch and intact collateral blood flow to the hand.

References

    1. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48 (Suppl 1): S176–S247 - PubMed
    1. Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C. et al. Editor's Choice - Vascular Access: 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 55: 757–818 - PubMed
    1. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T. et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75: S1–S164 - PubMed
    1. Gracz KC, Ing TS, Soung LS. et al. Proximal forearm fistula for maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1977; 11: 71–75 - PubMed
    1. Al Shakarchi J, Nath J, McGrogan D. et al. End-stage vascular access failure: can we define and can we classify? Clin Kidney J 2015; 8: 590–593 - PMC - PubMed