Association of Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors With Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Potential for Additive Multi-Cancer Detection via Liquid Biopsy Screening: A Claims-Based Study
- PMID: 34222015
- PMCID: PMC8241562
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.688455
Association of Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors With Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Potential for Additive Multi-Cancer Detection via Liquid Biopsy Screening: A Claims-Based Study
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate mammography uptake and subsequent breast cancer diagnoses, as well as the prospect of additive cancer detection via a liquid biopsy multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening test during a routine preventive care exam (PCE).
Methods: Patients with incident breast cancer were identified from five years of longitudinal Blue Health Intelligence® (BHI®) claims data (2014-19) and their screening mammogram and PCE utilization were characterized. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the association of a biennial screening mammogram with stage at diagnosis. Additional screening opportunities for breast cancer during a PCE within two years before diagnosis were identified, and the method extrapolated to all cancers, including those without recommended screening modalities.
Results: Claims for biennial screening mammograms and the time from screening to diagnosis were found to be predictors of breast cancer stage at diagnosis. When compared to women who received a screening mammogram proximal to their breast cancer diagnosis (0-4 months), women who were adherent to guidelines but had a longer time window from their screening mammogram to diagnosis (4-24 months) had a 87% increased odds of a later-stage (stages III or IV) breast cancer diagnosis (p-value <0.001), while women with no biennial screening mammogram had a 155% increased odds of a later-stage breast cancer diagnosis (p-value <0.001). This highlights the importance of screening in the earlier detection of breast cancer. Of incident breast cancer cases, 23% had no evidence of a screening mammogram in the two years before diagnosis. However, 49% of these women had a PCE within that time. Thus, an additional 11% of breast cancer cases could have been screened if a MCED test had been available during a PCE. Additionally, MCED tests have the potential to target up to 58% of the top 5 cancers that are the leading causes of cancer death currently without a USPSTF recommended screening modality (prostate, pancreatic, liver, lymphoma, and ovarian cancer).
Conclusion: The study used claims data to demonstrate the association of cancer screening with cancer stage at diagnosis and demonstrates the unmet potential for a MCED screening test which could be ordered during a PCE.
Keywords: breast cancer; cancer screening; claims data analysis; earlier detection; liquid biopsy; mammography; multi-cancer early detection; preventive care.
Copyright © 2021 Hathaway, Paetsch, Li, Wu, Asgarian, Parker, Welsh, Deverka and Cohain.
Conflict of interest statement
CH, YL, JW, SA, AP, AW, and AC were employed by Thrive, An Exact Sciences Company and hold equity and/or stock options in Exact Sciences. PP was employed by Blue Health Intelligence. PD was employed by the company Deverka Consulting.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;(35):39-46. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi036. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005. PMID: 16287884
-
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007. PMID: 23074501 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the impact of multi-cancer early detection test screening intervals on late-stage cancer at diagnosis and mortality using a state-transition model.BMJ Open. 2025 May 8;15(5):e086648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086648. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40341158 Free PMC article.
-
Transforming cancer screening: the potential of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) technologies.Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;30(2):180-193. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02694-5. Epub 2025 Jan 12. Int J Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39799530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shifting the Cancer Screening Paradigm: Developing a Multi-Biomarker Class Approach to Multi-Cancer Early Detection Testing.Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;14(8):925. doi: 10.3390/life14080925. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39202669 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Shifting the Cancer Screening Paradigm: The Rising Potential of Blood-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests.Cells. 2023 Mar 18;12(6):935. doi: 10.3390/cells12060935. Cells. 2023. PMID: 36980276 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening behaviours, demographics, and stage at diagnosis in the publicly funded Ontario Breast Screening Program.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;198(3):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06848-1. Epub 2023 Feb 17. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 36800117 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-cancer early detection test sensitivity for cancers with and without current population-level screening options.Tumori. 2023 Jun;109(3):335-341. doi: 10.1177/03008916221133136. Epub 2022 Oct 31. Tumori. 2023. PMID: 36316952 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Seer Cancer Stat Facts. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/ (Accessed September 17, 2020).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources